)]}'
[{"id":"openstack%2Fcinder-tempest-plugin~902142","triplet_id":"openstack%2Fcinder-tempest-plugin~master~If41efc6ebd07c75d14b7d0cc5be183e9da7c8cfa","project":"openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin","branch":"master","attention_set":{},"removed_from_attention_set":{"4523":{"account":{"_account_id":4523},"last_update":"2024-09-06 22:25:35.000000000","reason":"Change was submitted"},"10459":{"account":{"_account_id":10459},"last_update":"2024-08-20 18:40:50.000000000","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_10459\u003e replied on the change","reason_account":{"_account_id":10459}},"5314":{"account":{"_account_id":5314},"last_update":"2024-09-06 14:05:17.000000000","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_5314\u003e replied on the change","reason_account":{"_account_id":5314}}},"hashtags":[],"change_id":"If41efc6ebd07c75d14b7d0cc5be183e9da7c8cfa","subject":"Multiattach: Fix implicit requirement for encryption support","status":"MERGED","created":"2023-11-29 13:14:31.000000000","updated":"2024-09-06 22:25:35.000000000","submitted":"2024-09-06 22:25:35.000000000","submitter":{"_account_id":22348},"insertions":15,"deletions":8,"total_comment_count":13,"unresolved_comment_count":1,"has_review_started":true,"submission_id":"902142","meta_rev_id":"9a4d269b216559d3d67ccc6404ee64c3e9026b55","_number":902142,"virtual_id_number":902142,"owner":{"_account_id":4523},"current_revision_number":2,"requirements":[],"submit_records":[{"rule_name":"gerrit~DefaultSubmitRule","status":"CLOSED","labels":[{"label":"Verified","status":"MAY","applied_by":{"_account_id":22348}},{"label":"Code-Review","status":"MAY","applied_by":{"_account_id":5314}},{"label":"Workflow","status":"MAY","applied_by":{"_account_id":5314}},{"label":"Review-Priority","status":"MAY","applied_by":{"_account_id":10459}}]}]}]