)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":27900,"name":"Artem Goncharov","email":"artem.goncharov@gmail.com","username":"gtema"},"change_message_id":"b3ae8fba00cce68609f296d740c99bc617da554d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"6c5ee954_f6c973b6","updated":"2023-08-10 07:23:14.000000000","message":"I have mixed feelings on this. While technically your change is absolutely fine covering multiple independent functions in single module makes it harder to maintain (and impossible to be auto-generated from API bindings). I would rather go something similar to server_actions","commit_id":"6637556e7633636806d1d10e60af3ab33dcc1a23"},{"author":{"_account_id":28619,"name":"Dmitriy Rabotyagov","email":"noonedeadpunk@gmail.com","username":"noonedeadpunk"},"change_message_id":"5bc065f09593aceb685bf7cdc8591c063fd36fac","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"2ba2a913_80baebbb","in_reply_to":"6c5ee954_f6c973b6","updated":"2023-09-01 15:53:30.000000000","message":"Can you kindly elaborate what is server_actions? As I\u0027m not sure you\u0027re reffering to some module or api or sdk or anything else.\n\nWhy it made sense to me to add activate to image state - is it\u0027s somewhere in between, but, inactive image can have any visibility, and then if you add it as flag, like `is_hidden` (which I\u0027m not sure even works as it\u0027s never mentioned down the line?) - you\u0027d need some extra logic, as not operations are available. So it compliments state quite nicely IMO.\n\nAlso setting ability of code auto-generation as a requirement to code can be ... confusing for contributors 😄\n\nBut if you can share some \u0027requirements\u0027 or point me to a sample of how you think it would be better to implement - I can do that.","commit_id":"6637556e7633636806d1d10e60af3ab33dcc1a23"},{"author":{"_account_id":10969,"name":"Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey)","display_name":"Shnaidman Sagi","email":"sshnaidm@redhat.com","username":"sergsh"},"change_message_id":"3a5f96a13af92681b90cac7454f89bfacc462e51","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"92e9f005_cc4a45ac","updated":"2024-11-05 10:52:11.000000000","message":"Let\u0027s go with this for now.","commit_id":"8d9b8b9a35607287391802073a5963d35155f3bf"}]}