)]}'
{"guidelines/naming.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":7725,"name":"David Stanek","email":"dstanek@dstanek.com","username":"dstanek"},"change_message_id":"e649d5bb498bd06664c8513fe8a44b0a8f13688b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":48,"context_line":""},{"line_number":49,"context_line":"Status, on the other hand, should be used for cases where there is no"},{"line_number":50,"context_line":"expectation of a series of changes. A service may have the status of \"up\" or"},{"line_number":51,"context_line":"\"active\", and it is expected that it should remain like that unless either and"},{"line_number":52,"context_line":"admin changes it, or a failure occurs."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3a461143_3cf4ef85","line":51,"updated":"2017-01-26 21:29:40.000000000","message":"So if the service expected statuses like starting, stopping, etc. then they should really be using state instead of status?","commit_id":"9818603aafae0e7e1c68fbe2e343ac4658e604c0"},{"author":{"_account_id":7,"name":"Jay Pipes","email":"jaypipes@gmail.com","username":"jaypipes"},"change_message_id":"97a8a2797f590296d79d948036bea7682a4f56d4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":48,"context_line":""},{"line_number":49,"context_line":"Status, on the other hand, should be used for cases where there is no"},{"line_number":50,"context_line":"expectation of a series of changes. A service may have the status of \"up\" or"},{"line_number":51,"context_line":"\"active\", and it is expected that it should remain like that unless either and"},{"line_number":52,"context_line":"admin changes it, or a failure occurs."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3a461143_8ec27083","line":51,"in_reply_to":"3a461143_3cf4ef85","updated":"2017-01-31 23:38:23.000000000","message":"s/either and/either an/","commit_id":"9818603aafae0e7e1c68fbe2e343ac4658e604c0"}]}