)]}'
{"barbican/plugin/util/mime_types.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":7789,"name":"John Wood","email":"john.wood@rackspace.com","username":"woodster"},"change_message_id":"4e41fce61cb10ff6458bf974709aaed810103145","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":130,"context_line":"            {\u0027content_types\u0027: CTYPES_MAPPINGS[content_type.value]}"},{"line_number":131,"context_line":"        )"},{"line_number":132,"context_line":""},{"line_number":133,"context_line":"    for datum in secret.encrypted_data:"},{"line_number":134,"context_line":"        if datum.content_type in CTYPES_MAPPINGS:"},{"line_number":135,"context_line":"            fields.update("},{"line_number":136,"context_line":"                {\u0027content_types\u0027: CTYPES_MAPPINGS[datum.content_type]}"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"3a961159_20ecf6ba","line":133,"updated":"2014-12-19 18:38:59.000000000","message":"We really should be storing the content type for all secrets in secret.secret_store_metadata.get(\u0027content_type\u0027), and also in encrypted datum for HSM stores only. But the former should be authoritative for content-type. \n\nI don\u0027t believe secret_store plugins use the secret.encrypted_data field at all...so please remove #134 to 138, and also #122 to 123 above.","commit_id":"186902d1f60c156cbee7a0c0f3d4251d3c7756b7"}]}