)]}'
{"ceilometer/tests/network/statistics/test_statistics.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":8052,"name":"Nejc Saje","email":"nejc@saje.info","username":"nsaje"},"change_message_id":"b746367ae9f277c3734aca9901c70d81c01f901b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":90,"context_line":"                yield retval"},{"line_number":91,"context_line":"        return FakeDriver"},{"line_number":92,"context_line":""},{"line_number":93,"context_line":"    def _make_timestamps(self, count):"},{"line_number":94,"context_line":"        return [timeutils.isotime() for i in range(count)]"},{"line_number":95,"context_line":""},{"line_number":96,"context_line":"    def _get_samples(self, *resources):"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"baada198_96adeb86","line":93,"updated":"2014-07-14 06:53:28.000000000","message":"Wouldn\u0027t it make sense to actually make distinctive timestamps here? We might be missing some bugs if the timestamp checking is completely irrelevant.\n\nSomething like:\n now \u003d timeutils.isotime()\n return [now + dateutil.timedelta(seconds\u003di) for i in range(count)]","commit_id":"5a17f0c62683d4e83b09d280a9fff8efb6bc090f"}]}