)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":13177,"name":"Emma Foley","email":"efoley@redhat.com","username":"emma-l-foley"},"change_message_id":"2aa8acf4d257bd05ce6dc6addb143c7d8ea3c0fd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"24a5ccd7_2db48fd5","updated":"2026-05-05 17:12:47.000000000","message":"I like how it also gets rid of some general assertEquals, and uses the more specific assert_called_with, which is also more readable.","commit_id":"7a50a2c4424fd893fdef684f759f503daa7997be"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"84d9c7db0445aa926392ed15ef491acd804800e6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e5712e55_6e854def","updated":"2026-05-07 13:20:40.000000000","message":"I\u0027m fast-approving this because this is blocking requirements bump.","commit_id":"7a50a2c4424fd893fdef684f759f503daa7997be"}]}