)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":8992,"name":"Billy Olsen","email":"billy.olsen@canonical.com","username":"billy-olsen"},"change_message_id":"637e46b3f77be2ba9b979cae31845e084a439557","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":8,"id":"2a17f1d7_af23f562","updated":"2022-04-07 18:46:02.000000000","message":"Should we not at least have a non-voting zuul job for the spell checker if we\u0027re going to add the tox target here? I feel that some of the value is missed if we\u0027re not verifying it somewhere.\n\nTo address the non-obvious concerns, we should probably document what to do in the event of a spellcheck failure.","commit_id":"e040aefae245c3c9ed903e5fdedd1dc51a925e92"},{"author":{"_account_id":8992,"name":"Billy Olsen","email":"billy.olsen@canonical.com","username":"billy-olsen"},"change_message_id":"bddc73c670401ec57139518b92e04311de3dbf81","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":8,"id":"df7ebcff_f573504e","updated":"2022-04-07 18:46:31.000000000","message":"and I\u0027ll note, I\u0027m not opposed to this change - I think its a good change in general","commit_id":"e040aefae245c3c9ed903e5fdedd1dc51a925e92"}]}
