)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"b98b7d8f1f5b003e1c24f3c1c2c06f4fb7404471","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d6739012_7451eda8","updated":"2024-09-25 20:01:37.000000000","message":"Just want to be clear that my question about old jobs is completely independent of this patch, and is not a reason to hold it up.\n\nHere\u0027s the ML thread about what to do about the jobs:\nhttps://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/G35J3T7X5R4XNQC7N6ERWKCO7XJNBZUG/#G35J3T7X5R4XNQC7N6ERWKCO7XJNBZUG","commit_id":"ec47ff719f32ea5fb4e2869956f44170749d1d3c"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"1b827af0aaa5d9acbe5c703cc5d7e5ada89c5185","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d4a7ec4b_6d645fe7","updated":"2024-09-20 13:08:13.000000000","message":"Thanks for noticing this, Luigi.\n\nAs a followup, what should we do about the really old jobs that apply to branches that no longer exist in any form (for example, stable/train), or apply to branches whose name has been changed (for example, stable/wallaby is now unmaintained/wallaby)?  I guess delete the former and update the latter?\n\nI looked at a recent unmaintained/wallaby patch [0], and the cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican is configured to run in the check [1], but isn\u0027t running (presumably because there\u0027s no cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican-base job defined for unmaintained/wallaby).\n\nOn the other hand, the Unmaintained branch maintainers may be fine with that job not running, maybe we should ask on the mailing list (or put this on the agenda for the upcoming PTG).\n\n\n[0] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/926279?tab\u003dchange-view-tab-header-zuul-results-summary\n[1] https://opendev.org/openstack/cinder/src/branch/unmaintained/wallaby/.zuul.yaml#L68","commit_id":"ec47ff719f32ea5fb4e2869956f44170749d1d3c"},{"author":{"_account_id":10459,"name":"Luigi Toscano","email":"ltoscano@redhat.com","username":"ltoscano"},"change_message_id":"6d8bba879fac4cdbab550f2bc13e2a13529d5434","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ac664e12_261ef86f","updated":"2024-09-16 13:16:10.000000000","message":"This should reduce the execution time of the lvm-nvme job","commit_id":"ec47ff719f32ea5fb4e2869956f44170749d1d3c"},{"author":{"_account_id":10459,"name":"Luigi Toscano","email":"ltoscano@redhat.com","username":"ltoscano"},"change_message_id":"f9d7c1c79e58b24b37f1df926751ef15414adda6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"587791bf_2d99c5b3","updated":"2024-09-13 17:59:29.000000000","message":"check experimental","commit_id":"ec47ff719f32ea5fb4e2869956f44170749d1d3c"},{"author":{"_account_id":10459,"name":"Luigi Toscano","email":"ltoscano@redhat.com","username":"ltoscano"},"change_message_id":"e1b6925b38f407734b7b1bb698895c4b3ef32d73","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"2127cf12_2f783682","updated":"2024-09-16 09:45:49.000000000","message":"recheck\n\nthe change was applied but the affected job (lvm-nvmet-barbican) hit a timeout and there are no logs from the services","commit_id":"ec47ff719f32ea5fb4e2869956f44170749d1d3c"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"e7d68db4f495ff3bdfe7d061bd880c806a2149ca","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"c9f5da66_14da85f1","in_reply_to":"92c2fa67_18be8e9e","updated":"2024-09-20 13:49:59.000000000","message":"Last I heard, it\u0027s up to the Unmaintained maintainers to decide what level of CI is desirable/necessary/possible for the branches they are keeping around.  Since the cinder-tempest-plugin isn\u0027t branched, it\u0027s probably not on their radar, and they may not even be aware that these jobs aren\u0027t running.\n\nI\u0027ll send an email to the ML asking about this.","commit_id":"ec47ff719f32ea5fb4e2869956f44170749d1d3c"},{"author":{"_account_id":10459,"name":"Luigi Toscano","email":"ltoscano@redhat.com","username":"ltoscano"},"change_message_id":"222bb7e5326a6d4306fe568f91f34911f4b50290","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"92c2fa67_18be8e9e","in_reply_to":"d4a7ec4b_6d645fe7","updated":"2024-09-20 13:34:58.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t have the answers. I would say the key is in your last statement, so let\u0027s see what the maintainers of the unmaintained branches want.\nI think I missed some of the last updates: is the policy just to stop the jobs for unmaintained or is it more \"let\u0027s keep them until breaks, and if no one cares that\u0027s a sign that they should go EOL rather than unmaintained\"?","commit_id":"ec47ff719f32ea5fb4e2869956f44170749d1d3c"}]}