)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":13425,"name":"Simon Dodsley","email":"simon@everpuredata.com","username":"sdodsley"},"change_message_id":"5ffe0a5a9e5e81adf8154a38ffc9083e102919bc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"4720d876_4635ba3d","updated":"2026-09-28 18:59:06.000000000","message":"Well I sort of have to +1 this...","commit_id":"63a53893338162a48e99b4a3a0ac59172a32d1f3"},{"author":{"_account_id":34860,"name":"Amit Uniyal","email":"auniyal@redhat.com","username":"auniyal"},"change_message_id":"6a50c8438333689a0a56764070907ec474e8a5cf","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"7ba4ce42_e95fb68e","updated":"2026-10-21 15:13:53.000000000","message":"clean cherry-pick lgtm \nthe good thing is it was created by CLI - so commit msg update is clear too.","commit_id":"63a53893338162a48e99b4a3a0ac59172a32d1f3"}],"cinder/tests/unit/backup/test_chunkeddriver.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":39509,"name":"Lucas HENRY","display_name":"Lucas HENRY","email":"lucas.henry@ovhcloud.com","username":"polyedre"},"change_message_id":"a52d6686fb1e0dfc57138eabfae12ca11b21c442","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":571,"context_line":"        # The data-to-zero region is genuinely zeroed, not skipped."},{"line_number":572,"context_line":"        self.assertEqual(incr_payload, restored[0:chunk])"},{"line_number":573,"context_line":"        # A region only the base wrote is untouched by the incremental."},{"line_number":574,"context_line":"        self.assertEqual(untouched_payload, restored[8192:8192 + chunk])"},{"line_number":575,"context_line":""},{"line_number":576,"context_line":"    def test_delete_backup(self):"},{"line_number":577,"context_line":"        with mock.patch.object(self.driver, \u0027delete_object\u0027) as mock_delete:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"5acea279_026d4ee9","line":574,"updated":"2026-10-20 13:24:05.000000000","message":"This assertion can\u0027t fail, with or without the fix: neither code path ever writes offset 8192 during the incremental pass, so it doesn\u0027t prove the fix \"does not over-write regions the incremental never covered\". Either drop it, or check what the fix leaves alone: give the base an all-zero chunk and assert the volume was never written there (for example with a spy on volume_file.write), so the base still restores sparsely. Follow-up on master.","commit_id":"63a53893338162a48e99b4a3a0ac59172a32d1f3"}]}