)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":9535,"name":"Gorka Eguileor","email":"geguileo@redhat.com","username":"Gorka"},"change_message_id":"aac933eeee3816ffe7cefe9f977456f57e67d101","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"Optimize: Replace \u0027fields.Enum\u0027 with \u0027object\u0027"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"We don\u0027t use any advanced features of \u0027versionobjects.fields.Enum\u0027"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"in message fields. We can directly use \u0027object\u0027 there."},{"line_number":11,"context_line":""},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"Change-Id: I3e2a7f52c8348ff6b1fb82d849a26c650236e78c"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"3f1d235d_680b8fd5","line":10,"updated":"2017-07-05 09:25:22.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t think this is the reason why we should change to inherit from object, to me the reason is because messages are not being passed via RPC calls and therefore have no OVO, so we shouldn\u0027t be using its enum.  So this would be more a matter of correctness than optimization.","commit_id":"30ac541f8e27b8917dc482f0a41d18b8d8299bcd"}]}