)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":597,"name":"Pete Zaitcev","email":"zaitcev@kotori.zaitcev.us","username":"zaitcev"},"change_message_id":"7f1cd0b7f05e4a03d99b631c2b945553409bdea9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"dfb158a8_748fc32e","updated":"2024-05-18 04:06:48.000000000","message":"Although I\u0027m not sure how essential this is for a backport, +1 because it\u0027s not harmful.","commit_id":"245274505ec05dfd9ec5a48ef0545fccc7c687f4"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"e5b3fd33519e44aa657f6f472718005b63e4fd6a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"16084a5e_5a942f49","updated":"2024-05-22 13:25:34.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t know how I feel about this one.  It\u0027s not essential, but it\u0027s also not harmful.  Plus, since we changed the message in 2024.1, we\u0027re clearly not worried about incompatibilities in operators grepping the logs.  So we might as well change the messages in the stable branches so that people will be ready when they upgrade.\n\nSo I\u0027ll vote +2 on this, but will not put up a fight if other stable cores object to this backport.","commit_id":"245274505ec05dfd9ec5a48ef0545fccc7c687f4"},{"author":{"_account_id":7198,"name":"Jay Bryant","email":"jungleboyj@electronicjungle.net","username":"jsbryant"},"change_message_id":"b9237bfab508b8e838a01cdbda8a6f1e0858aea6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"2f36fdf1_434d49d9","updated":"2024-05-22 14:18:12.000000000","message":"I think this could either way.  I do see Brian\u0027s concerns, but it there is going to be an inconsistency somewhere either way.  Since it is in master I think it is ok to backport.","commit_id":"245274505ec05dfd9ec5a48ef0545fccc7c687f4"},{"author":{"_account_id":4523,"name":"Eric Harney","email":"eharney@redhat.com","username":"eharney"},"change_message_id":"9ea1bced47cdc393cd427562f7c3d19002996901","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"3da28984_a21d5a57","updated":"2024-03-13 19:37:43.000000000","message":"recheck\n\ncinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican failure is unrelated","commit_id":"245274505ec05dfd9ec5a48ef0545fccc7c687f4"}]}