)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"732242adc9f06b3abd23ce326ab714f6472e8861","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"440777f3_64129b6c","updated":"2026-02-12 03:20:06.000000000","message":"I agree with Sean that this isn\u0027t backport-eligible unless you can make a good case.  Just want to put a link here to the followup patch, because this definitely should not be backported without https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/975540 accompanying it.","commit_id":"a0cc3ee3a5c63cb8c86f0680448e3c6696a9c590"},{"author":{"_account_id":11904,"name":"Sean McGinnis","email":"sean.mcginnis@gmail.com","username":"SeanM"},"change_message_id":"df3e2050f2eee4c16f3e1144d421be0d7635edcf","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"64098230_6ddb1463","updated":"2026-02-03 15:30:53.000000000","message":"This is new functionality and configuration, so typically not eligible to be backported. Is there are strong reason for making an exception here.\n\nActually, looking at the nova comments from Sean on the change to master, I do not think this should be backported. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/658283","commit_id":"a0cc3ee3a5c63cb8c86f0680448e3c6696a9c590"},{"author":{"_account_id":38360,"name":"Zachary Mark Raines","display_name":"Zachary Raines","email":"zachary.raines@canonical.com","username":"raineszm","status":"Sustaining Engineer @ Canonical"},"change_message_id":"0b5a90db325b85f1a3a967aad0f0ba01f0807bd6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"0dd0f41f_51633481","updated":"2026-02-03 15:17:48.000000000","message":"recheck - test flakiness. py310 now fails instead of py312 and grenade skip level passed on previous run","commit_id":"a0cc3ee3a5c63cb8c86f0680448e3c6696a9c590"},{"author":{"_account_id":38360,"name":"Zachary Mark Raines","display_name":"Zachary Raines","email":"zachary.raines@canonical.com","username":"raineszm","status":"Sustaining Engineer @ Canonical"},"change_message_id":"6a8a4b1980f3854703843688946623698ef3312f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"c1b151f9_00fd3546","updated":"2026-02-02 21:50:37.000000000","message":"recheck -- cinder.tests.unit.volume.drivers.netapp.dataontap.utils.test_capabilities.CapabilitiesLibraryTestCase.test_update_ssc_2_iscsi passes without problems locally.","commit_id":"a0cc3ee3a5c63cb8c86f0680448e3c6696a9c590"},{"author":{"_account_id":38360,"name":"Zachary Mark Raines","display_name":"Zachary Raines","email":"zachary.raines@canonical.com","username":"raineszm","status":"Sustaining Engineer @ Canonical"},"change_message_id":"bad64ed7a10a59bf17b928cc8622e893541e05f6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"a0f32e41_9f32bbc1","in_reply_to":"64098230_6ddb1463","updated":"2026-02-03 15:36:52.000000000","message":"Yeah, Sean raised the point here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/658283/comment/bc718278_b3f7c9ce/ The motivation for backport here is that this fixes a performance issue for Window guests on the ceph RBD driver. \n\nWould it be tenable to slim this down to just an enable-512e flag on the RBD driver to address the performance issue without touching the broader ecosystem?","commit_id":"a0cc3ee3a5c63cb8c86f0680448e3c6696a9c590"}]}