)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":10058,"name":"Erlon R. Cruz","email":"erlon.rodrigues.cruz@canonical.com","username":"sombrafam"},"change_message_id":"9df98429384ab839f2ff265d135ef66e37be11d6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"0f599be6_2c9a936d","updated":"2026-05-22 16:29:14.000000000","message":"Hey Sam, thanks a lot for your patches (this one and the other two). For this specific patch, I don\u0027t have enough expertise to provide a voting, but I can tell you that since this is a very sensitive path, it will require thorough reasoning on the considerations you made for this implementation. You can refer to the message added by this commit as a reference [1].\n\nOne edge case you will need to explain for example, is how the new code will behave during an upgrade, where deployment without your fix and old volume structures will behave after the upgrade.\n\n[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/835384","commit_id":"c06ff0b171ba25f5fbbdcca43353759a5cc5a945"},{"author":{"_account_id":37798,"name":"Sam Clippinger","display_name":"samatwork","email":"sam.clippinger@garmin.com","username":"samatwork","status":"Garmin International"},"change_message_id":"3ec5bb855fbd586e9bf55b3261b755cbad6bf921","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"17599b84_aad32e6b","in_reply_to":"0f599be6_2c9a936d","updated":"2026-05-27 01:06:51.000000000","message":"Thanks for the feedback!  I\u0027ll update my commit message with a real writeup (instead of my usual terse one-liner).","commit_id":"c06ff0b171ba25f5fbbdcca43353759a5cc5a945"}]}