)]}'
{".zuul.yaml":[{"robot_id":"zuul","robot_run_id":"4020b2fc831b4f2ebc405c63a74c067a","url":"https://zuul.teim.app/t/main/buildset/4020b2fc831b4f2ebc405c63a74c067a","author":{"_account_id":28006,"name":"teim-ci","display_name":"teim-ci","email":"ci@seanmooney.info","username":"ci-sean-mooney","status":"this is a third-party ci account run by sean-k-mooney on irc\nhosted at zuul.teim.app"},"tag":"autogenerated:zuul:automatic-ci","change_message_id":"21fd13c7da27533696b6259397ab8abe6731ce80","patch_set":1,"id":"9b4eec29_8dfd7e50","line":9,"updated":"2026-03-31 11:05:49.000000000","message":"The cyborg-tempest-2026-1 job is only added to the check pipeline but not the gate pipeline. All other stable branch jobs (2025-2, 2025-1, 2024-2) share this same configuration, so this is consistent with current practice. However, consider whether the newest stable branch should be promoted to the gate pipeline once it has demonstrated stability in check.\n\n**Severity**: WARNING | **Confidence**: 0.8\n\n**Impact**: Without a gate job, a regression in stable/2026.1 compatibility could merge to master without being caught by the gate pipeline. This is consistent with how other stable branch jobs are handled, but is worth a conscious decision.\n\n**Suggestion**:\nIf the 2026.1 release is important to protect, consider adding cyborg-tempest-2026-1 to the gate pipeline once it passes check reliably, similar to how cyborg-tempest is in both check and gate.","commit_id":"c92a07bb55a5d163e7bb60cb20c3b40393070805"},{"robot_id":"zuul","robot_run_id":"4020b2fc831b4f2ebc405c63a74c067a","url":"https://zuul.teim.app/t/main/buildset/4020b2fc831b4f2ebc405c63a74c067a","author":{"_account_id":28006,"name":"teim-ci","display_name":"teim-ci","email":"ci@seanmooney.info","username":"ci-sean-mooney","status":"this is a third-party ci account run by sean-k-mooney on irc\nhosted at zuul.teim.app"},"tag":"autogenerated:zuul:automatic-ci","change_message_id":"21fd13c7da27533696b6259397ab8abe6731ce80","patch_set":1,"id":"81a4be24_320a79b4","line":79,"updated":"2026-03-31 11:05:49.000000000","message":"The commit message body is minimal (one sentence). While the change is simple and self-explanatory, adding a brief note about the expected testing scope or the branch status would improve the commit record for future reference.\n\n**Severity**: SUGGESTION | **Confidence**: 0.7\n\n**Benefit**: A more descriptive commit body would provide better context for future maintainers auditing CI job additions or investigating why a job was introduced.\n\n**Recommendation**:\nConsider expanding the commit body to include information such as: which OpenStack release cycle 2026.1 corresponds to, the rationale for choosing the noble nodeset, and whether the job is expected to remain check-only.","commit_id":"c92a07bb55a5d163e7bb60cb20c3b40393070805"}]}
