)]}'
{"cyborg/objects/ext_arq.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":26458,"name":"Brin Zhang","email":"zhangbailin@inspur.com","username":"zhangbailin"},"change_message_id":"b7796799d6d82da30dca708018295e6f8907704f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":167,"context_line":"        \"\"\"Delete all ARQs for given instance."},{"line_number":168,"context_line":""},{"line_number":169,"context_line":"        This is idempotent, i.e., it would have the same effect if called"},{"line_number":170,"context_line":"        repeatedly with the same instance UUID. In other words, it would"},{"line_number":171,"context_line":"        not raise an error on the second and later attempts even if the"},{"line_number":172,"context_line":"        first one has deleted the ARQs."},{"line_number":173,"context_line":"        \"\"\""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"df33271e_4ca00791","line":170,"updated":"2020-04-01 08:02:57.000000000","message":"right, it the arqs mapped to the instance already deleted, obj_extarqs will be [], that will not do for cycle and do obj_extarq.destroy(context) in for cycle, so that would not raise an error.","commit_id":"1f9a808f1d965063a2744c6ea6ddeb76a5d57061"}]}