)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"57c454d55b90a82b0044cd74c72ed80b3bede2fe","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":13,"context_line":""},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"This is harmless for instant binds: Nova compute polls Cyborg for"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"already-bound ARQs via exit_wait_early and skips the event wait"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"entirely.  The old code logged this at INFO with a misleading"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\"Ignoring\" message that suggested a problem."},{"line_number":18,"context_line":""},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"Downgrade the log to DEBUG with an explanation of why no retry is"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"needed, flatten the nested conditionals, and clean up stale"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":3,"id":"b1150b59_2ea96dfe","line":17,"range":{"start_line":16,"start_character":11,"end_line":17,"end_character":44},"updated":"2026-08-06 14:32:48.000000000","message":"that is not true\n\nignoring means we are ignoring it because its expected\n\nthis is prefectly reasonabel to have at info level or at debug\n\nit woudl only \"sugget\" that there is a problem at warning level","commit_id":"e7b77af69cb833159b5ce5b8f54de5c39f21bfb1"},{"author":{"_account_id":12393,"name":"chandan kumar","display_name":"Chandan Kumar","email":"chkumar@redhat.com","username":"chkumar246"},"change_message_id":"9c81fc1417867bd8ebaa7f135b10a6ec83c7fde8","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":13,"context_line":""},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"This is harmless for instant binds: Nova compute polls Cyborg for"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"already-bound ARQs via exit_wait_early and skips the event wait"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"entirely.  The old code logged this at INFO with a misleading"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\"Ignoring\" message that suggested a problem."},{"line_number":18,"context_line":""},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"Downgrade the log to DEBUG with an explanation of why no retry is"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"needed, flatten the nested conditionals, and clean up stale"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":3,"id":"4255a544_7c1b7fb1","line":17,"range":{"start_line":16,"start_character":11,"end_line":17,"end_character":44},"in_reply_to":"b1150b59_2ea96dfe","updated":"2026-08-06 15:21:37.000000000","message":"Yep, \"misleading\" was the wrong word.\n\nI have updated the message to \"The old INFO log was correct but fires on every instant bind with no operator action needed, so downgrade it to DEBUG with a more descriptive msg\".","commit_id":"e7b77af69cb833159b5ce5b8f54de5c39f21bfb1"}],"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":12393,"name":"chandan kumar","display_name":"Chandan Kumar","email":"chkumar@redhat.com","username":"chkumar246"},"change_message_id":"e377fd25d1fd04e9f51011851c6e8333734cbe5a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"2a3fe5e6_f4e0c1d7","updated":"2026-08-06 09:36:58.000000000","message":"Here is the reproducer for this behaviour: https://paste.openstack.org/raw/bMklG3eeHbHqfDL46a8H/","commit_id":"821926db575ac56a9688f26cf18ca71306eb163f"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"57c454d55b90a82b0044cd74c72ed80b3bede2fe","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"6b40ff7a_fc159581","updated":"2026-08-06 14:32:48.000000000","message":"im ok wiht improvign the message but this is not a bug, and the assumting that Ignoring impleis there is a probelm is wrong.\n\ninfo level message are intended to convay this type of information aboout the systems behvior but its ok to drop this to debug.\n\nwe do not need a sperate tracker for this as this is not something i woudl backprot\nif we had a tracker this woudl be a wishlist bug but this really is just assteic and not really requried","commit_id":"e7b77af69cb833159b5ce5b8f54de5c39f21bfb1"},{"author":{"_account_id":12393,"name":"chandan kumar","display_name":"Chandan Kumar","email":"chkumar@redhat.com","username":"chkumar246"},"change_message_id":"9c81fc1417867bd8ebaa7f135b10a6ec83c7fde8","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"4dea15f5_56b56221","in_reply_to":"6b40ff7a_fc159581","updated":"2026-08-06 15:21:37.000000000","message":"I am totally agreeing with you.\n\nI have reworded the commit message to drop the bug framing.\n\nThe old INFO log was correct; this is just log noise reduction (fires on every instant bind with nothing actionable) and cosmetic cleanup.\n\nI have also dropped the related bug from commit message.","commit_id":"e7b77af69cb833159b5ce5b8f54de5c39f21bfb1"}]}