)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":28609,"name":"Arkady Shtempler","email":"ashtempl@redhat.com","username":"ashtempl"},"change_message_id":"ad8c1eaa4870f2063bff5017f45a7c5789b47652","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":4,"id":"28979972_1edd7556","updated":"2021-10-12 10:50:49.000000000","message":"recheck","commit_id":"6d1eea8ea525471f16d00b769215d29ddf9dc607"},{"author":{"_account_id":28609,"name":"Arkady Shtempler","email":"ashtempl@redhat.com","username":"ashtempl"},"change_message_id":"eac95653f8835cae8dd0e25170d7314694667737","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":4,"id":"e7bbedc0_2ba9c728","updated":"2021-10-12 09:29:17.000000000","message":"recheck","commit_id":"6d1eea8ea525471f16d00b769215d29ddf9dc607"}],"designate_tempest_plugin/tests/api/v2/test_designate_limits.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":11628,"name":"Michael Johnson","email":"johnsomor@gmail.com","username":"johnsom"},"change_message_id":"c0a9f176bdf4d91c9ef4349dc1724a27ed723a0c","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":"        cls.alt_client \u003d cls.os_alt.designate_limit_client"},{"line_number":38,"context_line":"        cls.admin_client \u003d cls.os_admin.designate_limit_client"},{"line_number":39,"context_line":""},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"    @decorators.idempotent_id(\u00275a5118dc-d42a-11eb-aa4d-74e5f9e2a801\u0027)"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"    def test_list_designate_limits_as_primary_user(self):"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":"        expected_default_limits_fields \u003d ["},{"line_number":43,"context_line":"            \"max_page_limit\", \"max_recordset_name_length\","}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"353b2a58_d831dd2d","line":40,"updated":"2021-10-05 23:14:13.000000000","message":"We should try not to change these IDs. Designate is an refstack/interop project that can rely on these IDs.\nIn this case I think the test is still testing the same functionality, so I would leave the old ID intact.","commit_id":"54e77079a76cc764e69dd82201991c2123be3a12"},{"author":{"_account_id":11628,"name":"Michael Johnson","email":"johnsomor@gmail.com","username":"johnsom"},"change_message_id":"c0a9f176bdf4d91c9ef4349dc1724a27ed723a0c","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":44,"context_line":"            \"max_recordset_records\", \"max_zone_name_length\","},{"line_number":45,"context_line":"            \"max_zone_records\", \"max_zone_recordsets\","},{"line_number":46,"context_line":"            \"max_zones\", \"min_ttl\"].sort()"},{"line_number":47,"context_line":"        project_limits \u003d self.primary_client.list_designate_limits()"},{"line_number":48,"context_line":"        LOG.info("},{"line_number":49,"context_line":"            \u0027Retrieved designate limits are: {} \u0027.format(project_limits))"},{"line_number":50,"context_line":"        self.assertEqual("}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"013237db_f84e05da","line":47,"updated":"2021-10-05 23:14:13.000000000","message":"Ugh, this patch is going to conflict with the secure RBAC patches.\nWe should probably rebase these on top of the secure RBAC chain as these are independent patches.","commit_id":"54e77079a76cc764e69dd82201991c2123be3a12"}]}