)]}'
{"designate/objects/base.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":8094,"name":"Vinod Mangalpally","email":"mrvinod@outlook.com","username":"vinodmr"},"change_message_id":"faa4b375bdae8d6a66113039220a7aab986dee77","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":246,"context_line":""},{"line_number":247,"context_line":"        return self.to_primitive() \u003d\u003d other.to_primitive()"},{"line_number":248,"context_line":""},{"line_number":249,"context_line":"    def __ne__(self, other):"},{"line_number":250,"context_line":"        if self.__class__ \u003d\u003d other.__class__:"},{"line_number":251,"context_line":"            return self.to_primitive() !\u003d other.to_primitive()"},{"line_number":252,"context_line":"        else:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":5,"id":"baada198_a52d4200","line":249,"updated":"2014-07-14 16:29:10.000000000","message":"How about calling __eq__ in the implementation of __ne__ rather than implementing it?","commit_id":"6b08c0688cf4c372dd8be939962e893d1b03108f"},{"author":{"_account_id":741,"name":"Kiall Mac Innes","email":"kiall@macinnes.ie","username":"kiall"},"change_message_id":"81068a7a434d29b3398179a9e0f92ce86dfe7beb","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":246,"context_line":""},{"line_number":247,"context_line":"        return self.to_primitive() \u003d\u003d other.to_primitive()"},{"line_number":248,"context_line":""},{"line_number":249,"context_line":"    def __ne__(self, other):"},{"line_number":250,"context_line":"        if self.__class__ \u003d\u003d other.__class__:"},{"line_number":251,"context_line":"            return self.to_primitive() !\u003d other.to_primitive()"},{"line_number":252,"context_line":"        else:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":5,"id":"baada198_3665e6e0","line":249,"in_reply_to":"baada198_a52d4200","updated":"2014-07-14 17:40:09.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"6b08c0688cf4c372dd8be939962e893d1b03108f"}]}