)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":748,"name":"Armando Migliaccio","email":"armamig@gmail.com","username":"armando-migliaccio"},"change_message_id":"1b26bf36dfc2c9ede54bffacd6681e0569124016","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":11,"context_line":"Ia351dc137f28d8ce799d33dbd4c3a7564ed0bdf5 show that"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"the gate no longer uses neutron-debug for any tests."},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"So, let\u0027s simplify the configuration and not allocate"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"unused ports/addresses."},{"line_number":15,"context_line":""},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"Change-Id: I2649368fbcf869167c096f5fc71305f10c1adf6f"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"Signed-off-by: Ryan Moats \u003crmoats@us.ibm.com\u003e"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"dab17558_d7609dd1","line":14,"updated":"2016-05-10 22:32:32.000000000","message":"https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281508/ showed us that even if probes themselves are not that useful for testing purposes, their use is enough to validate that neutron-debug (the command tool) is somewhat sane. In fact neutron-debug (which is developed as a server side building block) relies on the client side and that should probably change no matter what.\n\nI would advise against this unless this is replaced with a more effective way of ensuring neutron-debug\u0027s correctness or in a larger context where we deprecate neutron-debug as a tool. In fact, with the transition to OSC I wonder what faith neutron-debug will need to experience.","commit_id":"cb3bc5cbf172bb95520241d0574904a60086609e"}]}