)]}'
{"lib/databases/postgresql":[{"author":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"change_message_id":"a85da2d1cc6c0abf7b2412613f91815449efec82","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":12,"context_line":"set +o xtrace"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":""},{"line_number":14,"context_line":""},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"MAX_DB_CONNECTIONS\u003d${MAX_DB_CONNECTIONS:-200}"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":""},{"line_number":17,"context_line":""},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"register_database postgresql"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-pgsql","patch_set":1,"id":"9a80dd14_7b1aeb7d","side":"PARENT","line":15,"updated":"2015-03-16 04:04:46.000000000","message":"as mentioned in my comments for I0682e222a3c5b4c8297372252f32ba291ae59fca i think this is not a good name, because it clearly implies it is some sort of global connection tuning option.\n\nI think it should be retired and replaced with POSTGRES_MAX_DB_CONNECTIONS.  We should still apply the old value but \"warn\" with a deprecation notice.","commit_id":"8506fed29e715173cf7052effcee908626ff8a38"}]}