)]}'
{"id":"openstack%2Fdiskimage-builder~422232","triplet_id":"openstack%2Fdiskimage-builder~master~Id0dc83d9c558b0c0bbfaed7727883541d140472c","project":"openstack/diskimage-builder","branch":"master","topic":"centos7-aarch64","hashtags":[],"change_id":"Id0dc83d9c558b0c0bbfaed7727883541d140472c","subject":"Adding aarch64 support for CentOS7","status":"MERGED","created":"2017-01-18 20:52:53.000000000","updated":"2017-04-05 05:32:29.000000000","submitted":"2017-04-05 05:10:05.000000000","submitter":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"total_comment_count":0,"unresolved_comment_count":0,"has_review_started":true,"meta_rev_id":"b25782a9b4d124371ab11bf4577a9c1989d81830","_number":422232,"virtual_id_number":422232,"owner":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"actions":{},"labels":{"Verified":{"approved":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"all":[{"value":0,"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},{"value":0,"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},{"value":0,"_account_id":12459,"name":"Stephanie Miller","email":"stephane@alum.mit.edu","username":"cinerama"},{"value":0,"_account_id":12715,"name":"John Trowbridge","email":"trown@redhat.com","username":"trown"},{"value":0,"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},{"value":2,"date":"2017-04-05 05:10:05.000000000","post_submit":true,"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"}],"values":{"-2":"Fails","-1":"Doesn\u0027t seem to work"," 0":"No score","+1":"Works for me","+2":"Verified"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true},"Code-Review":{"approved":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"all":[{"value":0,"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},{"value":2,"date":"2017-03-23 00:05:03.000000000","permitted_voting_range":{"min":2,"max":2},"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},{"value":0,"_account_id":12459,"name":"Stephanie Miller","email":"stephane@alum.mit.edu","username":"cinerama"},{"value":0,"_account_id":12715,"name":"John Trowbridge","email":"trown@redhat.com","username":"trown"},{"value":0,"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},{"value":0,"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"}],"values":{"-2":"Do not merge","-1":"This patch needs further work before it can be merged"," 0":"No score","+1":"Looks good to me, but someone else must approve","+2":"Looks good to me (core reviewer)"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true},"Workflow":{"approved":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"all":[{"value":0,"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},{"value":1,"date":"2017-04-04 03:06:39.000000000","permitted_voting_range":{"min":1,"max":1},"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},{"value":0,"_account_id":12459,"name":"Stephanie Miller","email":"stephane@alum.mit.edu","username":"cinerama"},{"value":0,"_account_id":12715,"name":"John Trowbridge","email":"trown@redhat.com","username":"trown"},{"value":0,"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},{"value":0,"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"}],"values":{"-1":"Work in progress"," 0":"Ready for reviews","+1":"Approved"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true}},"removable_reviewers":[],"reviewers":{"REVIEWER":[{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},{"_account_id":12459,"name":"Stephanie Miller","email":"stephane@alum.mit.edu","username":"cinerama"},{"_account_id":12715,"name":"John Trowbridge","email":"trown@redhat.com","username":"trown"},{"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"}]},"pending_reviewers":{},"reviewer_updates":[{"updated":"2017-01-19 13:42:32.000000000","updated_by":{"_account_id":12459,"name":"Stephanie Miller","email":"stephane@alum.mit.edu","username":"cinerama"},"reviewer":{"_account_id":12459,"name":"Stephanie Miller","email":"stephane@alum.mit.edu","username":"cinerama"},"state":"REVIEWER"},{"updated":"2017-01-19 14:31:56.000000000","updated_by":{"_account_id":12715,"name":"John Trowbridge","email":"trown@redhat.com","username":"trown"},"reviewer":{"_account_id":12715,"name":"John Trowbridge","email":"trown@redhat.com","username":"trown"},"state":"REVIEWER"},{"updated":"2017-01-24 21:18:31.000000000","updated_by":{"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},"reviewer":{"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},"state":"REVIEWER"},{"updated":"2017-04-04 03:06:39.000000000","updated_by":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"reviewer":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"state":"REVIEWER"},{"updated":"2017-04-05 05:10:05.000000000","updated_by":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"reviewer":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"state":"REVIEWER"}],"messages":[{"id":"d967392c54b5954a65fa3f916ba58f3dd559ae18","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-01-18 20:52:53.000000000","message":"Uploaded patch set 1.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"5179dab9d5b67edace14ac2523419b261770047d","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-01-18 20:54:46.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1: Workflow-1\n\nWorking with upstream CentOS to fix the cloud image, things almost finish building the overcloud-full, except the /boot directory isn\u0027t populated because the cloud image has a separate boot partition.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"87b84afd41b954d75504ced6705a874bff0540e6","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-01-18 21:52:29.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1: Verified+1\n\nBuild succeeded (check pipeline).\n\n- gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial http://docs-draft.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial/8faa1b5//doc/build/html/ : SUCCESS in 1m 15s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial/0d98b8f/ : SUCCESS in 2m 20s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial/d75c72d/ : SUCCESS in 1m 45s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python35 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-diskimage-builder-python35/40c4d34/ : SUCCESS in 1m 38s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty/2372544/ : SUCCESS in 31m 47s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial/25eded2/ : SUCCESS in 31m 47s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7/ffd5d49/ : SUCCESS in 39m 33s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty-extras-nv/9a8ff72/ : SUCCESS in 13m 38s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7-extras-nv/4c880ec/ : SUCCESS in 15m 14s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial-extras-nv/129a40d/ : SUCCESS in 12m 17s (non-voting)\n- gate-dsvm-nodepool-debian-src-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-dsvm-nodepool-debian-src-nv/e963ce5/ : SUCCESS in 31m 02s (non-voting)\n- gate-dsvm-nodepool-redhat-src-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check/gate-dsvm-nodepool-redhat-src-nv/e383775/ : FAILURE in 57m 44s (non-voting)","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"bec13337b0cb34940c39761b855c7ebfe34b41d0","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-01-19 00:28:04.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild succeeded (check-tripleo pipeline).\n\n- gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/1/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha/012bcfc/ : SUCCESS in 2h 07m 22s","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"aa463542ada79e1cec19db7281b16b081ddcab36","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-01-19 13:39:06.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1: -Workflow\n\nUsing the cloud image posted at\nhttps://people.centos.org/jperrin/\nOvercloud-full deploy and ramdisk builds succeed.\nThe image above will be posted at the official Centos repos soon, this was a test build jperrin put out for me to test with.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"e678287e6fd5b04e2567e826b53a60d2493b822a","author":{"_account_id":12715,"name":"John Trowbridge","email":"trown@redhat.com","username":"trown"},"date":"2017-01-19 14:31:56.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"03e4130a6efbb7dcc76ded6de857c029759dcddd","author":{"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},"date":"2017-01-19 19:59:51.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1: Code-Review-2\n\nIMHO there is currently no general agreement to extend the list of supported systems. On the contrary: there are currently discussions (e.g. [1]) to limit the supported systems to the ones that are tested in the gate.\n\nWhat I understand is, that you add aarch64 support for centos7: in contrast the documentation (and help) is changed in a way that for an end-user is looks that there is general support for this architecture.\n\nInstead of having this general approach: what about a \u0027centos7-aarch64\u0027 element? Also a functional test would be good to have.\n\n[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418204/","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"6804cc250d7fb8024b871c3755f1c2ba57f6375c","author":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"date":"2017-01-20 05:42:59.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1:\n\n@Andreas -- I hope my commment in  Ifb91b9089790897861bd7e671c3dba59adac239d clarifies at least my position on this.  centos/aarch64 is not \"stable\" as it is not tested.  I do not think that means we reject changes like this, but consumers such as Dan just have to be aware that despite our best efforts, things might break with this.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"8d759b75dc3f7924f672206265c510ca6d8002ec","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-01-20 15:07:31.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1:\n\n\u003e IMHO there is currently no general agreement to extend the list of\n \u003e supported systems. On the contrary: there are currently discussions\n \u003e (e.g. [1]) to limit the supported systems to the ones that are\n \u003e tested in the gate.\n \u003e \n \u003e What I understand is, that you add aarch64 support for centos7: in\n \u003e contrast the documentation (and help) is changed in a way that for\n \u003e an end-user is looks that there is general support for this\n \u003e architecture.\n \u003e \n \u003e Instead of having this general approach: what about a\n \u003e \u0027centos7-aarch64\u0027 element? Also a functional test would be good to\n \u003e have.\n \u003e \n \u003e [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418204/\n\nI\u0027m not opposed to adding another element if that\u0027s the way that the community chooses to implement it.\nThough I\u0027m not sure I understand why a new element would be created to handle a different value in arch flag that doesn\u0027t change how CentOS is built.\n\nWould it suffice to add to the docs or should the new element be added?","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"1134250022e0a2c948841ae7f8303035d7f1bdd5","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-01-20 15:12:11.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1:\n\n\u003e \u003e What I understand is, that you add aarch64 support for centos7:\n \u003e in\n \u003e \u003e contrast the documentation (and help) is changed in a way that\n \u003e for\n \u003e \u003e an end-user is looks that there is general support for this\n \u003e \u003e architecture.\n\none more thought here: armhf is also portrayed the same though I\u0027m not sure that there is general support for armhf. Should these two be handled consistently?","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"49de72f9724f78be3e081ace60b3b009140723ae","author":{"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},"date":"2017-01-21 19:12:50.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1\n\nAfter some discussion about the \u0027stable\u0027 and \u0027supported\u0027 (see the reference from my last comment), I think in principle this kind of patch can be accepted (therefore -2 -\u003e -1).\n\nBut there are some things that should be investigated:\n* the architecture is until now given as used in Debian / Ubuntu (i.e. amd64, armhf). We should stay with this approach. Therefore I\u0027d use \u0027arm64\u0027 here.\n* I did not get it running using Debian - although I followed exactly the documentation (e.g. doc/source/developer/components.rst).  Your current adaptions of the documentation implies that this architecture works in general.  Please either support all distributions or state clearly in the help that this architecture is only available for Centos7 element (therefore the idea of a dedicated element).\n* it would be really good if you could provide a test case for this.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"2b06dc9fb6032d17038ed577e95f2ad3684c2667","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-01-24 12:42:09.000000000","message":"Uploaded patch set 2.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"82a5669f161e536400a520c8c593f264152f50c2","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-01-24 12:47:40.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1:\n\n\u003e After some discussion about the \u0027stable\u0027 and \u0027supported\u0027 (see the\n \u003e reference from my last comment), I think in principle this kind of\n \u003e patch can be accepted (therefore -2 -\u003e -1).\n \u003e \n \u003e But there are some things that should be investigated:\n \u003e * the architecture is until now given as used in Debian / Ubuntu\n \u003e (i.e. amd64, armhf). We should stay with this approach. Therefore\n \u003e I\u0027d use \u0027arm64\u0027 here.\n\nMade updates here, used x86_64 as a model where there are different names\nfor the architectures and tried to handle both but prefer arm64 in the docs.\n\n\n \u003e * I did not get it running using Debian - although I followed\n \u003e exactly the documentation (e.g. doc/source/developer/components.rst).\n \u003e  Your current adaptions of the documentation implies that this\n \u003e architecture works in general.  Please either support all\n \u003e distributions or state clearly in the help that this architecture\n \u003e is only available for Centos7 element (therefore the idea of a\n \u003e dedicated element).\n\nI have only tested on CentOS thus far. I used armhf as a model here\nas an arch that is only supported on debian. Is that what you were looking\nfor or did you want documentation that more specifically stated what has\nbeen tested? Since armhf didn\u0027t have this I didn\u0027t go too deep into detail.\n\n \u003e * it would be really good if you could provide a test case for\n \u003e this.\n\nI looked for tests on armhf to model tests after. I\u0027m not super familiar\nwriting tests for bash, I\u0027ll look through some of the other tests and see\nif I can figure something out. At this point I\u0027d need some pointers to\nget started writing a test case.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"aed0e77cac8c22f41e7dedd0ea05e2038b7e1ac9","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-01-24 13:22:05.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2: Verified+1\n\nBuild succeeded (check pipeline).\n\n- gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial http://docs-draft.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial/fd5fca6//doc/build/html/ : SUCCESS in 1m 38s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial/9c8ab1f/ : SUCCESS in 2m 27s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial/ca58d9b/ : SUCCESS in 1m 06s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python35 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-diskimage-builder-python35/490b6b7/ : SUCCESS in 49s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty/e4fc3dd/ : SUCCESS in 31m 09s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial/a342208/ : SUCCESS in 30m 06s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7/db1988a/ : SUCCESS in 34m 05s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty-extras-nv/13c5a32/ : SUCCESS in 14m 14s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7-extras-nv/ce20992/ : SUCCESS in 14m 58s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial-extras-nv/8f7cda8/ : SUCCESS in 11m 51s (non-voting)\n- gate-dsvm-nodepool-debian-src-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-dsvm-nodepool-debian-src-nv/3c7ea32/ : SUCCESS in 31m 36s (non-voting)\n- gate-dsvm-nodepool-redhat-src-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check/gate-dsvm-nodepool-redhat-src-nv/9ce7ec5/ : SUCCESS in 38m 23s (non-voting)","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"0601de7b18bc2776a8c849da2ea138721c7ea2ad","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-01-24 14:42:49.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild succeeded (check-tripleo pipeline).\n\n- gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/2/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha/5c150f1/ : SUCCESS in 2h 00m 12s","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"dce808030101f786379448ba12837f2d63865f12","author":{"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},"date":"2017-01-24 21:18:31.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2: Code-Review-1\n\nI\u0027m not quite sure... When I run\n\n$ disk-image-create -a arm64 -x --image-size\u003d50G -t docker --docker-target dib-test-arm64 debian-minimal\n\nan appropriate docker image will be created [1]:\n\n$ sudo docker run -t -i dib-test-arm64 /bin/bash\nroot@0d2a2fbaa2c7:/# dpkg --print-architecture\narm64\n\nWhen I exchange the \u0027debian-minimal\u0027 with \u0027centos7\u0027, disk-image-create runs into an error:\n\nchroot: failed to run command ‘bin/tar’: No such file or directory\n\nCan you please have a look?\n\nCan you please describe your environment (e.g. host system) and the command you executed?\n\n\n[1] Using master with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/423853/","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"0254274b45dc53fa7c58eb6d83cdc7256a887b2c","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-01-25 14:22:45.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\nI\u0027ve been invoking disk-image create with tripleoclient\nusing this command:\nDIB_CLOUD_IMAGES\u003d\"https://people.centos.org/jperrin/\" \\\nbreak\u003dafter-error \\\nDIB_YUM_REPO_CONF\u003d\"/etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-deps-newton.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-newton.repo  /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo\" \\\nopenstack --debug overcloud image build --type overcloud-full --node-arch arm64\n\nI add the newton repo to the centos host and install python-tripleoclient and its dependencies and execute that command. The DIB_CLOUD_IMAGES won\u0027t be nessesary once the upstream Cent build runs again to update the base cloud image.\n\nI\u0027ll try and take a look at getting it to work with docker images.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"e94efd967154240160dcdfb1c3969587082a0311","author":{"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},"date":"2017-01-26 22:20:21.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\nJust a hint: the problem is not about docker only. The same problem occurs when trying to create a \u0027normal\u0027 VM image.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"e98a1bdd0a32a4bfc9a8adbc9fd2c87a0923a599","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-02-13 20:44:14.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\nI can\u0027t seem to reproduce this, did you use the custom cent images when you got this error? Cent has updated their upstream arm cloud image and it wasn\u0027t posted when I first posted this patch.\n\nI think I\u0027m using the generic upstream cloud image now and the command you posted builds just fine","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"4a1bf48e0dd7f906edaa7ee5f097012efcac44dc","author":{"_account_id":21741,"name":"Andreas Florath","email":"andreas@florath.net","username":"florath"},"date":"2017-02-15 10:04:49.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\nIMHO you misunderstood me: if you in general add an architecture (here arm64) to the main script, a user must assume that this is valid for all options (e.g. distributions).  Therefore I checked this for debian and it failed.\nAlso I\u0027m not sure if all currently supported (tested) distributions support arm64.\nSo there need to be a hint in the documentation and a test if the pair (architecture/distribution) is valid.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"d433a1f97e931d57b06a6e18e437f8fe3628406a","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-02-15 15:02:53.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\nah, k yes did misunderstand that, I added to the documentation, but I\u0027ve not added checks to validate yet. I\u0027ll do that","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"e366f050b71469cc093e8fd0bd23a203df85e54a","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-03-08 11:02:19.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2: Verified-1\n\nMerge Failed.\n\nThis change or one of its cross-repo dependencies was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of its repository. Please rebase the change and upload a new patchset.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"603423631fa89266eba2135b660dd687ada31a8b","author":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"date":"2017-03-22 06:59:13.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\nI think I\u0027m ok with this if rebased; it does not seem invasive.\n\nSetting ARCH seems totally dependent on base elements/platform that we\u0027re building; I don\u0027t think we have anything in generic code that really depends on ${ARCH}?  common-defaults here is just normalising the name.  I think it\u0027s fine to just have this as a documentation point in those elements that support these arches.\n\nThat said, if this grows to things like custom hacks to bootloader elements, etc ... well we\u0027ve seen what a mess we\u0027ve got into with PPC.  I think as reviewers we can do much better by making sure what we commit is maintainable (assiting to bring CI being the gold-standard, but ensuring relevant, useful comments, using the right APIs, etc)","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"18eea0493785c1b4756195cbdb6f966eadcb08d1","author":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"date":"2017-03-22 14:47:06.000000000","message":"Uploaded patch set 3.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"5d0bb00ce9aabbdc8d9090f00d59e7c6e44dd2a8","author":{"_account_id":10118,"name":"IBM PowerKVM CI","email":"kvmpower@linux.vnet.ibm.com","username":"powerkvm","tags":["SERVICE_USER"]},"date":"2017-03-22 14:53:30.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild succeeded. Test completed on IBM PowerKVM platform. For rechecking only on the IBM PowerKVM CI, add a review comment with pkvm: recheck. For contact and more information, see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PowerKVM\n\n- dib-dsvm-functests-devstack-xenial http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_3d8e6ecb-f597-448c-8ec2-164e9f710dd6/pkvmci/diskimage-builder/32/422232/3/check/dib-dsvm-functests-devstack-xenial/dbc1484/ : SUCCESS in 5m 57s (non-voting)","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"aa1210fb27f357536c88bbd9bfffc76ea770e478","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-03-22 15:45:40.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3: Verified+1\n\nBuild succeeded (check pipeline).\n\n- gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial http://docs-draft.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial/1799b69//doc/build/html/ : SUCCESS in 1m 43s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial/789bd9a/ : SUCCESS in 1m 55s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial/8b1c1d8/ : SUCCESS in 1m 39s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python35 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-diskimage-builder-python35/1022c7e/ : SUCCESS in 1m 12s\n- diskimage-builder-coverage-ubuntu-xenial-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/diskimage-builder-coverage-ubuntu-xenial-nv/9419768/ : SUCCESS in 1m 44s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty/e5a290a/ : SUCCESS in 36m 04s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial/85673e6/ : SUCCESS in 56m 23s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7/29c6aa4/ : SUCCESS in 38m 45s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty-extras-nv/61110cf/ : SUCCESS in 26m 07s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7-extras-nv/bf87aaa/ : SUCCESS in 25m 40s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial-extras-nv/5323696/ : FAILURE in 14m 00s (non-voting)\n- gate-dsvm-nodepool-debian-src-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dsvm-nodepool-debian-src-nv/02c4d99/ : SUCCESS in 32m 57s (non-voting)\n- gate-dsvm-nodepool-redhat-src-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dsvm-nodepool-redhat-src-nv/f6c95d3/ : SUCCESS in 38m 21s (non-voting)","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"cd7c158f8e194f878e22247b55677b934da70f49","author":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"date":"2017-03-23 00:05:03.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2\n\nI\u0027d like a follow-on to make the documentation a bit clearer ... using \"-a\" does set ${ARCH} but it\u0027s really up to the elements what happens with this.  So we\u0027d be better pointing this out and adding to each OS element what architectures it can handle.  i mean it doesn\u0027t mention ppc, and that\u0027s one actively in use","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"e548bc434eaac4084f0bbb809f684ed2154ad221","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-03-23 00:16:31.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild failed (check-tripleo pipeline).  For information on how to proceed, see http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#automated-testing\n\n\n- gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha/72fe4e0/ : FAILURE in 1h 52m 24s","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"41f0013f31e8b6d4be4069c04c09c42ebb14f4b3","author":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"date":"2017-04-04 03:06:39.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3: Workflow+1","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"8227d60f5b23d6322c447d89cbb1d7c714028ebe","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-04-04 03:06:49.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3: -Verified\n\nStarting gate jobs.\nhttp://status.openstack.org/zuul/","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"fae307a8a6f6265695fb27db95b7e9a65666140c","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-04-04 05:17:03.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3: Verified-2\n\nBuild failed (gate pipeline).  For information on how to proceed, see http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#automated-testing\n\n- gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial http://docs-draft.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial/c58200f//doc/build/html/ : SUCCESS in 2m 19s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial/f7df44d/ : SUCCESS in 1m 34s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial/a30889c/ : SUCCESS in 1m 18s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python35 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-diskimage-builder-python35/3f88f57/ : SUCCESS in 1m 42s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty/32b7b0e/ : SUCCESS in 40m 18s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial/90df5e1/ : SUCCESS in 42m 07s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7/b4f7800/ : FAILURE in 1h 05m 09s","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"c8f6dc81a3a803ecf80921f0e5ea7720ae54223f","author":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"date":"2017-04-05 03:28:51.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3:\n\nrecheck","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"7c5a95b4eaeac02425e36512315a375d98247e4d","author":{"_account_id":10118,"name":"IBM PowerKVM CI","email":"kvmpower@linux.vnet.ibm.com","username":"powerkvm","tags":["SERVICE_USER"]},"date":"2017-04-05 03:36:43.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild succeeded. Test completed on IBM PowerKVM platform. For rechecking only on the IBM PowerKVM CI, add a review comment with pkvm: recheck. For contact and more information, see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PowerKVM\n\n- dib-dsvm-functests-devstack-xenial http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_3d8e6ecb-f597-448c-8ec2-164e9f710dd6/pkvmci/diskimage-builder/32/422232/3/check/dib-dsvm-functests-devstack-xenial/b360a3e/ : FAILURE in 7m 38s (non-voting)","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"27ad2afffd008eedc48c2b029674d2d83d6f7694","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-04-05 04:28:42.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3: Verified+1\n\nBuild succeeded (check pipeline).\n\n- gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial http://docs-draft.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial/21155e6//doc/build/html/ : SUCCESS in 41s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial/dfa2c89/ : SUCCESS in 1m 29s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial/908f761/ : SUCCESS in 1m 37s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python35 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-diskimage-builder-python35/639c9bd/ : SUCCESS in 1m 15s\n- diskimage-builder-coverage-ubuntu-xenial-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/diskimage-builder-coverage-ubuntu-xenial-nv/7f52c2f/ : SUCCESS in 1m 04s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty/e639946/ : SUCCESS in 33m 03s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial/7bd6a01/ : SUCCESS in 59m 36s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7/7074b06/ : SUCCESS in 34m 38s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty-extras-nv/c72cf8a/ : SUCCESS in 24m 40s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7-extras-nv/4b86419/ : SUCCESS in 30m 42s (non-voting)\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial-extras-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial-extras-nv/a42e6fc/ : SUCCESS in 50m 13s (non-voting)\n- gate-dsvm-nodepool-redhat-src-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dsvm-nodepool-redhat-src-nv/243fbcd/ : SUCCESS in 41m 27s (non-voting)\n- gate-dsvm-nodepool-ubuntu-src-nv http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check/gate-dsvm-nodepool-ubuntu-src-nv/43212fe/ : SUCCESS in 44m 48s (non-voting)","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"855aac899d71d7d84bcb432c1201f42aa079935c","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-04-05 04:28:52.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3: -Verified\n\nStarting gate jobs.\nhttp://status.openstack.org/zuul/","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"089ad586ae66f626e4a1f25e04fdf5b7c7260cdd","date":"2017-04-05 05:10:05.000000000","message":"Change has been successfully merged into the git repository by Jenkins","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"699471757061ae07fd7ef57469a3aed92033c0d4","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-04-05 05:10:05.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3: Verified+2\n\nBuild succeeded (gate pipeline).\n\n- gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial http://docs-draft.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-diskimage-builder-docs-ubuntu-xenial/8850858//doc/build/html/ : SUCCESS in 1m 13s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-diskimage-builder-pep8-ubuntu-xenial/1a80dd5/ : SUCCESS in 57s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-diskimage-builder-python27-ubuntu-xenial/f2a4cbb/ : SUCCESS in 1m 11s\n- gate-diskimage-builder-python35 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-diskimage-builder-python35/0bb7669/ : SUCCESS in 1m 11s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-trusty/c4ba474/ : SUCCESS in 38m 16s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-ubuntu-xenial/80ef1fa/ : SUCCESS in 31m 11s\n- gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7 http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/gate/gate-dib-dsvm-functests-centos-7/c00fd77/ : SUCCESS in 41m 11s","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3},{"id":"8cfd3e488c1a51cb86501480f61faa26cffafbb8","author":{"_account_id":3,"name":"Jenkins","username":"jenkins"},"date":"2017-04-05 05:32:29.000000000","message":"Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild succeeded (check-tripleo pipeline).\n\n- gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha http://logs.openstack.org/32/422232/3/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha/91d06d4/ : SUCCESS in 2h 03m 24s","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":3}],"current_revision_number":3,"current_revision":"06576a02f09d1326cad342bc0901334e4c79722e","revisions":{"caf9150c7c5244ce49e251dd1ad364d30367a282":{"kind":"REWORK","_number":1,"created":"2017-01-18 20:52:53.000000000","uploader":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"ref":"refs/changes/32/422232/1","fetch":{"anonymous http":{"url":"https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder","ref":"refs/changes/32/422232/1","commands":{"Checkout":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/1 \u0026\u0026 git checkout FETCH_HEAD","Cherry Pick":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/1 \u0026\u0026 git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD","Format Patch":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/1 \u0026\u0026 git format-patch -1 --stdout FETCH_HEAD","Pull":"git pull https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/1"}}},"commit":{"parents":[{"commit":"f735864b78ce7ea6cce642d9433011960a01ad99","subject":"Merge \"Replace yaml.load() with yaml.safe_load()\"","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/f735864b78ce7ea6cce642d9433011960a01ad99"}]}],"author":{"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","date":"2017-01-18 20:49:20.000000000","tz":-300},"committer":{"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","date":"2017-01-18 20:52:53.000000000","tz":-300},"subject":"Adding aarch64 support for CentOS7","message":"Adding aarch64 support for CentOS7\n\nUsing delorian, delorian-deps and epel-release for aarch64\nthis will produce an overcloud-full image\n\nChange-Id: Id0dc83d9c558b0c0bbfaed7727883541d140472c\n","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/caf9150c7c5244ce49e251dd1ad364d30367a282"}],"resolve_conflicts_web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/caf9150c7c5244ce49e251dd1ad364d30367a282"}]},"branch":"refs/heads/master"},"914614c963121e217c6f6ecbaca3d1e6576053c5":{"kind":"REWORK","_number":2,"created":"2017-01-24 12:42:09.000000000","uploader":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"ref":"refs/changes/32/422232/2","fetch":{"anonymous http":{"url":"https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder","ref":"refs/changes/32/422232/2","commands":{"Checkout":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/2 \u0026\u0026 git checkout FETCH_HEAD","Cherry Pick":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/2 \u0026\u0026 git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD","Format Patch":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/2 \u0026\u0026 git format-patch -1 --stdout FETCH_HEAD","Pull":"git pull https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/2"}}},"commit":{"parents":[{"commit":"1a94a72965f49d6d2c73e98eface27756fded5a9","subject":"Merge \"Set grub device in /etc/default/grub\"","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/1a94a72965f49d6d2c73e98eface27756fded5a9"}]}],"author":{"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","date":"2017-01-18 20:49:20.000000000","tz":-300},"committer":{"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","date":"2017-01-24 12:40:46.000000000","tz":-300},"subject":"Adding aarch64 support for CentOS7","message":"Adding aarch64 support for CentOS7\n\nUsing delorian and delorian-deps for aarch64\nthis will produce an overcloud-full image\n\nChange-Id: Id0dc83d9c558b0c0bbfaed7727883541d140472c\n","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/914614c963121e217c6f6ecbaca3d1e6576053c5"}],"resolve_conflicts_web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/914614c963121e217c6f6ecbaca3d1e6576053c5"}]},"branch":"refs/heads/master"},"06576a02f09d1326cad342bc0901334e4c79722e":{"kind":"REWORK","_number":3,"created":"2017-03-22 14:47:06.000000000","uploader":{"_account_id":5792,"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","username":"dradez"},"ref":"refs/changes/32/422232/3","fetch":{"anonymous http":{"url":"https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder","ref":"refs/changes/32/422232/3","commands":{"Checkout":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/3 \u0026\u0026 git checkout FETCH_HEAD","Cherry Pick":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/3 \u0026\u0026 git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD","Format Patch":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/3 \u0026\u0026 git format-patch -1 --stdout FETCH_HEAD","Pull":"git pull https://review.opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder refs/changes/32/422232/3"}}},"commit":{"parents":[{"commit":"f1d53f2e31db15a03c6acbe01bf22b4f65adc60b","subject":"Merge \"Use sphinx warning-is-error\"","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/f1d53f2e31db15a03c6acbe01bf22b4f65adc60b"}]}],"author":{"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","date":"2017-01-18 20:49:20.000000000","tz":-300},"committer":{"name":"Dan Radez","email":"dradez@redhat.com","date":"2017-03-22 14:46:54.000000000","tz":-240},"subject":"Adding aarch64 support for CentOS7","message":"Adding aarch64 support for CentOS7\n\nUsing delorian and delorian-deps for aarch64\nthis will produce an overcloud-full image\n\nChange-Id: Id0dc83d9c558b0c0bbfaed7727883541d140472c\n","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/06576a02f09d1326cad342bc0901334e4c79722e"}],"resolve_conflicts_web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/06576a02f09d1326cad342bc0901334e4c79722e"}]},"branch":"refs/heads/master"}},"requirements":[],"submit_records":[],"submit_requirements":[]}