)]}'
{"futurist/tests/test_executors.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"7bfc88c7aac30640a027d32c482df75a6b7c9f52","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":57,"context_line":""},{"line_number":58,"context_line":""},{"line_number":59,"context_line":"class TestExecutors(testscenarios.TestWithScenarios, base.TestCase):  # type: ignore[misc]"},{"line_number":60,"context_line":"    executor_cls: type"},{"line_number":61,"context_line":"    executor_kwargs: dict[str, Any]"},{"line_number":62,"context_line":"    restartable: bool"},{"line_number":63,"context_line":"    scenarios \u003d ["}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"a6b44251_693807f7","line":60,"updated":"2026-10-05 10:44:04.000000000","message":"unfortunately we don\u0027t have a base `Executor` class fwict, so the best we can do here is:\n\n```suggestion\n    executor_cls: type[futurist.SynchronousExecutor | futurist.GreenThreadPoolExecutor]\n```\n\nbut tbh, I\u0027d be more inclined to add the missing base class and tweak this, since that would be useful for external consumers also","commit_id":"7cdf386e73429698ee73dbd68accf2beb39b6038"}]}