)]}'
{"specs/ussuri/approved/glance/spec-lite-deprecate-checksum.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"bfb15c48412242293e84321fd3caaedb591630cd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":38,"context_line":"               We could remove the \u0027checksum\u0027 entirely, but this would require"},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"               a migration to the multihash.  For at least some backends, this"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"               would mean downloading the image data for each legacy image to"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"               do the computation, which could take a very long time."},{"line_number":42,"context_line":""},{"line_number":43,"context_line":":timeline: Deprecation and release note in Ussuri; removal in Victoria."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"3fa7e38b_b7edb902","line":41,"updated":"2020-02-19 22:19:46.000000000","message":"If an operator wanted to do this on their own, could they?  I think glance won\u0027t allow os_hash_algo/value to be set on an image with status\u003d\u003dactive.  I wonder if we should think about what changes would have to happen to make this possible--or maybe, nobody really cares about legacy images.","commit_id":"7a594d33eb037ff9077d804413f31e4e9920209c"}]}