)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"4ad4696c30d904e0b24024ebaf5cb1b5780fbd0c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e4e60ff9_42bf5f95","updated":"2022-04-21 12:14:44.000000000","message":"Bence: thanks for reporting your test results.\n\nPatch looks good to me.","commit_id":"ba4af147fb93d522f8cf396098891f4cbe7b30fb"},{"author":{"_account_id":9303,"name":"Abhishek Kekane","email":"akekane@redhat.com","username":"abhishekkekane"},"change_message_id":"c4a50cd0be79239210ddb43bb3a766f2ccff4a2d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"a92af0bc_b2c11ab9","updated":"2022-04-21 09:15:13.000000000","message":"Is there any way to verify this via test?\n","commit_id":"ba4af147fb93d522f8cf396098891f4cbe7b30fb"},{"author":{"_account_id":32074,"name":"Harsh Ailani","email":"haailani@in.ibm.com","username":"haailani"},"change_message_id":"1db259ca2ac7b24e69993adf5dc8af2b60a4cb54","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"1c92dbb5_2f49b971","updated":"2022-04-19 12:35:38.000000000","message":"Patch looks good. Zuul is also passed.","commit_id":"ba4af147fb93d522f8cf396098891f4cbe7b30fb"},{"author":{"_account_id":15554,"name":"Bence Romsics","email":"bence.romsics@gmail.com","username":"ebenrom","status":"working for Ericsson, UTC+1 (+DST)"},"change_message_id":"ec82fb3fade71b4ac76dbd25b132cf9e1a307520","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ffdb70cf_97476c48","updated":"2022-04-19 12:22:12.000000000","message":"Pulled this patch into a devstack and tested with up to 6 parallel \"openstack image save\"-s (before that clearing glance cache manually). The error I was seeing before this patch (\"Unable to download image: InvalidResponse\") is now gone.","commit_id":"ba4af147fb93d522f8cf396098891f4cbe7b30fb"},{"author":{"_account_id":27615,"name":"Rajat Dhasmana","email":"rajatdhasmana@gmail.com","username":"whoami-rajat"},"change_message_id":"2f6406a81515b8148e8259e142a5e2d1dee5d052","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"db383cdf_7628d72e","updated":"2022-04-21 09:33:50.000000000","message":"Thanks Abhishek for the review.\nWe can add tests to tempest but it\u0027s not trivial, I will look into the feasibility of test coverage for the multiattach support.","commit_id":"ba4af147fb93d522f8cf396098891f4cbe7b30fb"},{"author":{"_account_id":27615,"name":"Rajat Dhasmana","email":"rajatdhasmana@gmail.com","username":"whoami-rajat"},"change_message_id":"2f6406a81515b8148e8259e142a5e2d1dee5d052","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"46d427cf_d0ae1c51","in_reply_to":"a92af0bc_b2c11ab9","updated":"2022-04-21 09:33:50.000000000","message":"This can be checked under the following conditions:\n1) glance backend is cinder\n2) cinder backend has multiattach support (lvm will work)\n3) we need to have simultaneous create volume from image or image download operations to verify it\n\nNote that this failure occurs during the transition of volume from reserved-\u003eattaching-\u003ein-use state so can only be reproduced if another attach_volume request occurs when the volume is reserved or in attaching state\n\nMaybe we can add a test to tempest but i think it\u0027s better to cover all cases, I will look into the feasibility of adding tests for different cases to test the multiattach support.","commit_id":"ba4af147fb93d522f8cf396098891f4cbe7b30fb"}]}