)]}'
{"glance/cmd/api.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"22493e5c88c3dca4d6bb50903b386832c645e0a7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":57,"context_line":"KNOWN_EXCEPTIONS \u003d (RuntimeError,"},{"line_number":58,"context_line":"                    exception.WorkerCreationFailure,"},{"line_number":59,"context_line":"                    glance_store.exceptions.BadStoreConfiguration,"},{"line_number":60,"context_line":"                    cfg.ConfigFileValueError,"},{"line_number":61,"context_line":"                    ValueError)"},{"line_number":62,"context_line":""},{"line_number":63,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3f4b6375_e11ce114","line":60,"updated":"2017-10-27 22:50:25.000000000","message":"I understand why you inserted this before ValueError (because of how it\u0027s used at line 91), but the whole point of this section of code seems to be to give a specific int value for each known exception.  This change is going to give ValueError a higher value than it used to have (in other words, it\u0027s a backward incompatible change).  I think we need to think of a different way to do this.","commit_id":"b5d3a86536663fe866b159d33afff43f3abd71ff"}]}