)]}'
{"glance/tests/unit/test_gateway.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"a032030fe6912f124440e869f1b4a640d2165527","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":267,"context_line":"            self.assertIsInstance(repo, authorization.ImageMemberRepoProxy)"},{"line_number":268,"context_line":"            mock_proxy.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY, mock.ANY,"},{"line_number":269,"context_line":"                                               mock.sentinel.context,"},{"line_number":270,"context_line":"                                               mock.ANY)"},{"line_number":271,"context_line":""},{"line_number":272,"context_line":"    @mock.patch(\u0027glance.api.policy.ImageMemberRepoProxy\u0027)"},{"line_number":273,"context_line":"    def test_get_member_repo_without_auth(self, mock_proxy):"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":5,"id":"3d6c31f6_b0e05297","line":270,"updated":"2021-08-11 14:20:25.000000000","message":"I just noticed that we\u0027re only checking the policy layer and not the auth one, which is a pattern I started above on Image where I just checked one layer and not the other, because it started as just auth and then policy was added later.\n\nWe should probably go back and add the remaining assertions later.","commit_id":"d9b8023410348e769f8a69c168461126ce7ff6fc"}]}
