)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"27c7e55ba4d195a64a59e9940b9f450975344fed","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3c44494a_e505089b","updated":"2022-05-23 16:24:56.000000000","message":"Thanks for the follow-through of fixing the underlying problem in the lib!","commit_id":"85e85497d4ccb4e158c1351c867aa91f2340bc22"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"0b948077308b13ac5931f2d408c56e38685a4eca","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"bc2c0086_f76c4589","updated":"2022-05-25 19:39:51.000000000","message":"Failures are in jobs configured to use the new change, but don\u0027t appear to be related","commit_id":"6af8b6e51c78ca8cf8259a4a6d63e5a7b5220088"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"3cbbb55444f5311d237fe36618c992ab0a2bd7d7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"a7455d99_cd85cc24","updated":"2022-05-24 20:00:17.000000000","message":"I think the requirements-check failure is due to change I75a025d3c347cc895 in openstack/requirements.\nI put up a patch to revert that change: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/843191\nYou can look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/843143 if you want to see why I think that change is the culprit.\n","commit_id":"6af8b6e51c78ca8cf8259a4a6d63e5a7b5220088"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"dac97c68bb75e9bb7d90d2b9a6988617a8f9b686","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"bb5e78a6_9e7ddcb8","updated":"2022-05-25 16:19:07.000000000","message":"Looking at the logs from the glance-multistore-cinder-import failure and comparing it to a successful run from this patch, looks like a timeout occurred during the final test.  From the n-cpu log, looks like an operation that took 115 sec on the successful run took 172 sec on the failed run.  So I think the test may have succeeded were it given some more time. On the other hand, both the compute and volume build_timeout is set to 196 in tempest.conf, so I may be on the wrong track.","commit_id":"6af8b6e51c78ca8cf8259a4a6d63e5a7b5220088"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"85dfbee4f50eae75f70860c1ea5b04931a1f9f54","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"6a5fa3c4_ee321fd9","updated":"2022-05-25 11:35:50.000000000","message":"recheck - requirements-check : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/843191 has merged, should be OK now","commit_id":"6af8b6e51c78ca8cf8259a4a6d63e5a7b5220088"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"3eb02a6f711ff634db5adb38ad0c2149966aa304","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"2da88773_eddbbf15","updated":"2022-05-25 16:22:09.000000000","message":"recheck glance-multistore-cinder-import - timeout during tempest.scenario.test_volume_boot_pattern.TestVolumeBootPattern.test_image_defined_boot_from_volume","commit_id":"6af8b6e51c78ca8cf8259a4a6d63e5a7b5220088"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"4fbb807ca145f14df431259d0e97349a0d7e1892","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"ac207e8b_d868d011","updated":"2022-05-25 13:02:21.000000000","message":"recheck glance-multistore-cinder-import failure in setUpClass (tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest) : tempest.lib.exceptions.Conflict: Conflict with state of target resource: Details: 409 Conflict Image status transition from active to saving is not allowed (if it were related to this patch, we\u0027d see way more than 1 failure)","commit_id":"6af8b6e51c78ca8cf8259a4a6d63e5a7b5220088"}],"glance/tests/unit/async_/flows/plugins/test_image_conversion.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"27c7e55ba4d195a64a59e9940b9f450975344fed","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":275,"context_line":"                                                 self.task.task_id,"},{"line_number":276,"context_line":"                                                 self.task_type,"},{"line_number":277,"context_line":"                                                 self.wrapper)"},{"line_number":278,"context_line":"        self.assertEqual(fake_interpreter, convert.python)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"df371449_f673652d","line":278,"updated":"2022-05-23 16:24:56.000000000","message":"This doesn\u0027t really confirm that we end up using the right interpreter which was the original problem. But, doing so would involve mocking the internals of the thing where the bug/change was so I guess we can just pretend like it never happened :)","commit_id":"85e85497d4ccb4e158c1351c867aa91f2340bc22"}]}