)]}'
{"reference/house-rules.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":6088,"name":"Emmet Hikory","email":"persia@shipstone.jp","username":"persia"},"change_message_id":"4bee732470ff2f6a92264c173dac17d41cd0ccdc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":76,"context_line":"---------------"},{"line_number":77,"context_line":""},{"line_number":78,"context_line":"In a resolution regarding :ref:`leaderless programs`, the TC was granted"},{"line_number":79,"context_line":"authority to appoint a Project Team Lead to any official project where the"},{"line_number":80,"context_line":"`election`_ process failed to produce a leader. When this happens,"},{"line_number":81,"context_line":"``reference/projects.yaml`` in the ``governance`` repository should be updated"},{"line_number":82,"context_line":"to by the volunteer to indicate the new PTL and their appointment by adding"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"their info along with an ``appointed`` key with a value of the date of their"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3f79a3b5_73c36539","line":80,"range":{"start_line":79,"start_character":65,"end_line":80,"end_character":46},"updated":"2018-08-10 22:31:00.000000000","message":"Should there be an explicit description of what happens when the election process fails to produce a leader?  Should this result in an update to projects.yaml indicating the lack of leader?  Something else?  Maybe something similar to the proposed model, with an \"elected\" key?","commit_id":"f8eb91485da6c93ae01a462ccc759a820d13d717"},{"author":{"_account_id":6088,"name":"Emmet Hikory","email":"persia@shipstone.jp","username":"persia"},"change_message_id":"4bee732470ff2f6a92264c173dac17d41cd0ccdc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":79,"context_line":"authority to appoint a Project Team Lead to any official project where the"},{"line_number":80,"context_line":"`election`_ process failed to produce a leader. When this happens,"},{"line_number":81,"context_line":"``reference/projects.yaml`` in the ``governance`` repository should be updated"},{"line_number":82,"context_line":"to by the volunteer to indicate the new PTL and their appointment by adding"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"their info along with an ``appointed`` key with a value of the date of their"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":"appointment to the ``ptl`` section of the project entry. A date is used so that"},{"line_number":85,"context_line":"a substantive change must be submitted for review, and thus approval by the TC,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3f79a3b5_33916d48","line":82,"range":{"start_line":82,"start_character":3,"end_line":82,"end_character":19},"updated":"2018-08-10 22:31:00.000000000","message":"I\u0027d suggest dropping \"by the volunteer\".  While it might be preferred for a volunteer for appointment to file the change, encoding that in this document limits flexibility in the future if it makes sense for someone else to submit it (for any of a number of reasons).","commit_id":"f8eb91485da6c93ae01a462ccc759a820d13d717"},{"author":{"_account_id":5263,"name":"Jeremy Stanley","display_name":"fungi","email":"fungi@yuggoth.org","username":"fungi","status":"missing, presumed fed"},"change_message_id":"4d7d9b35a34d79553ddd0d0b52d7db5d1abb4d6d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":79,"context_line":"authority to appoint a Project Team Lead to any official project where the"},{"line_number":80,"context_line":"`election`_ process failed to produce a leader. When this happens,"},{"line_number":81,"context_line":"``reference/projects.yaml`` in the ``governance`` repository should be updated"},{"line_number":82,"context_line":"to by the volunteer to indicate the new PTL and their appointment by adding"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"their info along with an ``appointed`` key with a value of the date of their"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":"appointment to the ``ptl`` section of the project entry. A date is used so that"},{"line_number":85,"context_line":"a substantive change must be submitted for review, and thus approval by the TC,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3f79a3b5_ba80fec0","line":82,"updated":"2018-08-10 15:24:27.000000000","message":"Is the \"to\" here stray?","commit_id":"f8eb91485da6c93ae01a462ccc759a820d13d717"},{"author":{"_account_id":11564,"name":"Chris Dent","email":"cdent@anticdent.org","username":"chdent"},"change_message_id":"484d5f31e8ab7e65e8549241834a84a598765314","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":79,"context_line":"authority to appoint a Project Team Lead to any official project where the"},{"line_number":80,"context_line":"`election`_ process failed to produce a leader. When this happens,"},{"line_number":81,"context_line":"``reference/projects.yaml`` in the ``governance`` repository should be updated"},{"line_number":82,"context_line":"to by the volunteer to indicate the new PTL and their appointment by adding"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"their info along with an ``appointed`` key with a value of the date of their"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":"appointment to the ``ptl`` section of the project entry. A date is used so that"},{"line_number":85,"context_line":"a substantive change must be submitted for review, and thus approval by the TC,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3f79a3b5_358f1f76","line":82,"in_reply_to":"3f79a3b5_ba80fec0","updated":"2018-08-10 15:51:06.000000000","message":"yes, will fix either here or in a fup, depending on the quantity of other sugestions","commit_id":"f8eb91485da6c93ae01a462ccc759a820d13d717"},{"author":{"_account_id":5263,"name":"Jeremy Stanley","display_name":"fungi","email":"fungi@yuggoth.org","username":"fungi","status":"missing, presumed fed"},"change_message_id":"4d7d9b35a34d79553ddd0d0b52d7db5d1abb4d6d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":82,"context_line":"to by the volunteer to indicate the new PTL and their appointment by adding"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"their info along with an ``appointed`` key with a value of the date of their"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":"appointment to the ``ptl`` section of the project entry. A date is used so that"},{"line_number":85,"context_line":"a substantive change must be submitted for review, and thus approval by the TC,"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"even in the event that the PTL from the prior cycle has been re-appointed."},{"line_number":87,"context_line":""},{"line_number":88,"context_line":"These changes are subject to the standard review and approval guidelines."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3f79a3b5_da85bad0","line":85,"updated":"2018-08-10 15:24:27.000000000","message":"\"approved\" maybe?","commit_id":"f8eb91485da6c93ae01a462ccc759a820d13d717"},{"author":{"_account_id":6088,"name":"Emmet Hikory","email":"persia@shipstone.jp","username":"persia"},"change_message_id":"4bee732470ff2f6a92264c173dac17d41cd0ccdc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":82,"context_line":"to by the volunteer to indicate the new PTL and their appointment by adding"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"their info along with an ``appointed`` key with a value of the date of their"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":"appointment to the ``ptl`` section of the project entry. A date is used so that"},{"line_number":85,"context_line":"a substantive change must be submitted for review, and thus approval by the TC,"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"even in the event that the PTL from the prior cycle has been re-appointed."},{"line_number":87,"context_line":""},{"line_number":88,"context_line":"These changes are subject to the standard review and approval guidelines."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3f79a3b5_73aa8571","line":85,"in_reply_to":"3f79a3b5_554adbab","updated":"2018-08-10 22:31:00.000000000","message":"Could be a cycle name instead of a date to avoid the complications with dates (detail that doesn\u0027t matter).","commit_id":"f8eb91485da6c93ae01a462ccc759a820d13d717"},{"author":{"_account_id":2472,"name":"Doug Hellmann","email":"dhellmann@redhat.com","username":"doug-hellmann"},"change_message_id":"698961f912b132d8d0792f546a4c99ba48c319b3","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":82,"context_line":"to by the volunteer to indicate the new PTL and their appointment by adding"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"their info along with an ``appointed`` key with a value of the date of their"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":"appointment to the ``ptl`` section of the project entry. A date is used so that"},{"line_number":85,"context_line":"a substantive change must be submitted for review, and thus approval by the TC,"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"even in the event that the PTL from the prior cycle has been re-appointed."},{"line_number":87,"context_line":""},{"line_number":88,"context_line":"These changes are subject to the standard review and approval guidelines."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3f79a3b5_d5b4abd3","line":85,"in_reply_to":"3f79a3b5_55e17b29","updated":"2018-08-10 16:03:31.000000000","message":"When is the appointment date? Isn\u0027t that when the change is approved, rather than proposed? Do we need a date? Can we just add \"appointed: true\" or a comment?","commit_id":"f8eb91485da6c93ae01a462ccc759a820d13d717"},{"author":{"_account_id":11564,"name":"Chris Dent","email":"cdent@anticdent.org","username":"chdent"},"change_message_id":"d7dd73357276d09890a14137906db9364a41195e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":82,"context_line":"to by the volunteer to indicate the new PTL and their appointment by adding"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"their info along with an ``appointed`` key with a value of the date of their"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":"appointment to the ``ptl`` section of the project entry. A date is used so that"},{"line_number":85,"context_line":"a substantive change must be submitted for review, and thus approval by the TC,"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"even in the event that the PTL from the prior cycle has been re-appointed."},{"line_number":87,"context_line":""},{"line_number":88,"context_line":"These changes are subject to the standard review and approval guidelines."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3f79a3b5_554adbab","line":85,"in_reply_to":"3f79a3b5_d5b4abd3","updated":"2018-08-10 16:12:45.000000000","message":"It can\u0027t be \u0027appointed: true\u0027 because what if it is already \u0027appointed: true\u0027 (as described by line 86). We need a diff.\n\nIn the next version I\u0027ll make it clear that the date is the date that the person who volunteered or was press-ganged volunteered or, simpler, the date of the submission of the change.\n\nWe don\u0027t want to use the approval date because we don\u0027t know that. We only know the date now, or recently in the past when the humans talked about this decision.\n\nThe exact details of the date don\u0027t matter as long as it is near \u0027now\u0027 and \u0027now\u0027 is near the beginning of the  PTL\u0027s term.","commit_id":"f8eb91485da6c93ae01a462ccc759a820d13d717"},{"author":{"_account_id":11564,"name":"Chris Dent","email":"cdent@anticdent.org","username":"chdent"},"change_message_id":"484d5f31e8ab7e65e8549241834a84a598765314","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":82,"context_line":"to by the volunteer to indicate the new PTL and their appointment by adding"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"their info along with an ``appointed`` key with a value of the date of their"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":"appointment to the ``ptl`` section of the project entry. A date is used so that"},{"line_number":85,"context_line":"a substantive change must be submitted for review, and thus approval by the TC,"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"even in the event that the PTL from the prior cycle has been re-appointed."},{"line_number":87,"context_line":""},{"line_number":88,"context_line":"These changes are subject to the standard review and approval guidelines."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3f79a3b5_55e17b29","line":85,"in_reply_to":"3f79a3b5_da85bad0","updated":"2018-08-10 15:51:06.000000000","message":"I intended \"approval\" but I guess it is a bit awkward. The idea is that approval comes after the action where it was submitted.\n\nAs above, I\u0027ll tweak this in whatever matter seems best, later","commit_id":"f8eb91485da6c93ae01a462ccc759a820d13d717"},{"author":{"_account_id":12898,"name":"Tony Breeds","email":"tony@bakeyournoodle.com","username":"tonyb"},"change_message_id":"a4e5032e22a5b421e305a1e60650f9bc09c76b3e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":85,"context_line":"list. If the key is not present, add it and set the cycle as a single member of"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"a list. This format is used for two reasons: to track all the cycles for which"},{"line_number":87,"context_line":"there has been an appointment and to require a comprehensible change for review"},{"line_number":88,"context_line":"by the TC. The ``appointed`` key should only be changed when the PTL was not"},{"line_number":89,"context_line":"chosen by the election process."},{"line_number":90,"context_line":""},{"line_number":91,"context_line":"These changes are subject to the standard review and approval guidelines."},{"line_number":92,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"3f79a3b5_cf20699e","line":89,"range":{"start_line":88,"start_character":11,"end_line":89,"end_character":31},"updated":"2018-08-14 06:16:14.000000000","message":"Minor nit as I\u0027m pretty sure we\u0027re all on the same page but I\u0027m assuming that the the ``appointed`` key will be removed should the PTL be chosen by the election process.","commit_id":"e783b307ea1e3cf029a6e5a37da9140db4a50a56"},{"author":{"_account_id":2472,"name":"Doug Hellmann","email":"dhellmann@redhat.com","username":"doug-hellmann"},"change_message_id":"21237976b33f20b6941dfef5f8dad5725ab74069","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":85,"context_line":"list. If the key is not present, add it and set the cycle as a single member of"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"a list. This format is used for two reasons: to track all the cycles for which"},{"line_number":87,"context_line":"there has been an appointment and to require a comprehensible change for review"},{"line_number":88,"context_line":"by the TC. The ``appointed`` key should only be changed when the PTL was not"},{"line_number":89,"context_line":"chosen by the election process."},{"line_number":90,"context_line":""},{"line_number":91,"context_line":"These changes are subject to the standard review and approval guidelines."},{"line_number":92,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"3f79a3b5_d686b9b9","line":89,"range":{"start_line":88,"start_character":11,"end_line":89,"end_character":31},"in_reply_to":"3f79a3b5_40ef461d","updated":"2018-08-14 14:36:30.000000000","message":"Maybe we can clarify that in a follow-up.","commit_id":"e783b307ea1e3cf029a6e5a37da9140db4a50a56"},{"author":{"_account_id":12898,"name":"Tony Breeds","email":"tony@bakeyournoodle.com","username":"tonyb"},"change_message_id":"5014538cb5481ce62334b3d0dd23ed7ddcaac6d7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":85,"context_line":"list. If the key is not present, add it and set the cycle as a single member of"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"a list. This format is used for two reasons: to track all the cycles for which"},{"line_number":87,"context_line":"there has been an appointment and to require a comprehensible change for review"},{"line_number":88,"context_line":"by the TC. The ``appointed`` key should only be changed when the PTL was not"},{"line_number":89,"context_line":"chosen by the election process."},{"line_number":90,"context_line":""},{"line_number":91,"context_line":"These changes are subject to the standard review and approval guidelines."},{"line_number":92,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"3f79a3b5_b067614d","line":89,"range":{"start_line":88,"start_character":11,"end_line":89,"end_character":31},"in_reply_to":"3f79a3b5_40ef461d","updated":"2018-08-15 19:34:15.000000000","message":"Okay looking at the follow-on patches that makes sense.","commit_id":"e783b307ea1e3cf029a6e5a37da9140db4a50a56"},{"author":{"_account_id":11564,"name":"Chris Dent","email":"cdent@anticdent.org","username":"chdent"},"change_message_id":"0e02896a49ebf4fad541cae83c051c7bf049b809","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":85,"context_line":"list. If the key is not present, add it and set the cycle as a single member of"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"a list. This format is used for two reasons: to track all the cycles for which"},{"line_number":87,"context_line":"there has been an appointment and to require a comprehensible change for review"},{"line_number":88,"context_line":"by the TC. The ``appointed`` key should only be changed when the PTL was not"},{"line_number":89,"context_line":"chosen by the election process."},{"line_number":90,"context_line":""},{"line_number":91,"context_line":"These changes are subject to the standard review and approval guidelines."},{"line_number":92,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"3f79a3b5_40ef461d","line":89,"range":{"start_line":88,"start_character":11,"end_line":89,"end_character":31},"in_reply_to":"3f79a3b5_cf20699e","updated":"2018-08-14 09:31:03.000000000","message":"No, it would stay. The idea is to maintain a history of when appointments happened, even if the current cycle was not an appointment.","commit_id":"e783b307ea1e3cf029a6e5a37da9140db4a50a56"}]}