)]}'
{"reference/release-naming.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":1,"name":"James E. Blair","email":"jim@acmegating.com","username":"corvus"},"change_message_id":"6bc78377a07917d1180d1175831d926f24d9f7da","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":101,"context_line":""},{"line_number":102,"context_line":"#. The name must refer to the name of the geographic feature, not merely"},{"line_number":103,"context_line":"   describe a generic type of geographic feature (e.g. \"City\" or \"Peak\""},{"line_number":104,"context_line":"   would not be eligible)."},{"line_number":105,"context_line":""},{"line_number":106,"context_line":"Names which do not meet these criteria but otherwise sound really cool"},{"line_number":107,"context_line":"should be added to a separate section of the wiki page and the TC may"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"7faddb67_b6e0a6cd","line":104,"updated":"2019-08-21 17:13:34.000000000","message":"I would just add \"A word which normally describes a geographic feature may be used if it is the name of the feature (for example \"City Park\" would make \"City\" eligible).\n\nJeremy, I would suggest the standard of \"does it appear on a map?\"","commit_id":"900fd50621dc415d55d378f5362b11940ee70f50"},{"author":{"_account_id":1,"name":"James E. Blair","email":"jim@acmegating.com","username":"corvus"},"change_message_id":"d720a4f18162311f5dcdac505af37fc095b226c9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":101,"context_line":""},{"line_number":102,"context_line":"#. The name must refer to the name of the geographic feature, not merely"},{"line_number":103,"context_line":"   describe a generic type of geographic feature (e.g. \"City\" or \"Peak\""},{"line_number":104,"context_line":"   would not be eligible)."},{"line_number":105,"context_line":""},{"line_number":106,"context_line":"Names which do not meet these criteria but otherwise sound really cool"},{"line_number":107,"context_line":"should be added to a separate section of the wiki page and the TC may"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"7faddb67_73832004","line":104,"updated":"2019-08-21 16:22:06.000000000","message":"What about \"University Park\" for University?\n\nIt may be worth noting that this would have disallowed \"Pike\" if it were in place at the time (and so is overturning precedent.","commit_id":"900fd50621dc415d55d378f5362b11940ee70f50"},{"author":{"_account_id":4257,"name":"Zane Bitter","email":"zbitter@redhat.com","username":"zaneb"},"change_message_id":"9ed99a85fec9fd6483bfe6a811ff3a54f87c56fd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":101,"context_line":""},{"line_number":102,"context_line":"#. The name must refer to the name of the geographic feature, not merely"},{"line_number":103,"context_line":"   describe a generic type of geographic feature (e.g. \"City\" or \"Peak\""},{"line_number":104,"context_line":"   would not be eligible)."},{"line_number":105,"context_line":""},{"line_number":106,"context_line":"Names which do not meet these criteria but otherwise sound really cool"},{"line_number":107,"context_line":"should be added to a separate section of the wiki page and the TC may"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"7faddb67_d3c1b430","line":104,"in_reply_to":"7faddb67_73832004","updated":"2019-08-21 16:27:32.000000000","message":"Good question. I believe University would be legit in that case since it\u0027s the actual name of the feature. Happy to change the wording to make that clearer if we can think of what that would look like.\n\nI agree that Pike would have needed an exception under this process. We could document this in the commit message maybe?","commit_id":"900fd50621dc415d55d378f5362b11940ee70f50"},{"author":{"_account_id":23078,"name":"Jeremy Freudberg","email":"jeremyfreudberg@gmail.com","username":"jeremyfreudberg"},"change_message_id":"dcdc108302e603a7c2e461ef30208ce453dd3c32","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":101,"context_line":""},{"line_number":102,"context_line":"#. The name must refer to the name of the geographic feature, not merely"},{"line_number":103,"context_line":"   describe a generic type of geographic feature (e.g. \"City\" or \"Peak\""},{"line_number":104,"context_line":"   would not be eligible)."},{"line_number":105,"context_line":""},{"line_number":106,"context_line":"Names which do not meet these criteria but otherwise sound really cool"},{"line_number":107,"context_line":"should be added to a separate section of the wiki page and the TC may"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"7faddb67_93f01c69","line":104,"in_reply_to":"7faddb67_d3c1b430","updated":"2019-08-21 16:46:44.000000000","message":"As someone from Massachusetts I do not believe \"Pike\" would have needed an exception. \"Pike\" is not the type of feature, it is the feature itself. If someone says to me, \"Did you hear about that accident on the pike?\" then I can only understand it as referring to the one and only Massachusetts Turnpike... \"the pike\" cannot refer to e.g. the Middlesex Turnpike, Newburyport Turnpike etc. Just saying.","commit_id":"900fd50621dc415d55d378f5362b11940ee70f50"}]}