)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":36848,"name":"Alvaro Soto","display_name":"Alvaro Soto","email":"alsotoes@gmail.com","username":"alsotoes"},"change_message_id":"f68e6b4753f17673361f5f00392d3511673e54d9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d61278fd_d7cf1d36","updated":"2024-08-09 00:36:54.000000000","message":"+1","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"317e3d1f0a8c18065f28312447604c28fdd5ab75","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"f68b06fe_e575c43b","updated":"2024-08-07 22:04:37.000000000","message":"@noonedeadpunk@gmail.com @alsotoes@gmail.com\n\nIf you\u0027d like to keep the DPL model and remain as the liaisons, please -1 this change before Aug 13th 2024","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"8dc2f49784d3a9e7bec354ac61ef30bb856f4adc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e706c9ea_7f54c8c8","updated":"2024-08-09 05:14:34.000000000","message":"So now we have approvals from all affected persons on both this one and on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/925997/1 which is essentially a revert, which to me implies that we should abandon both instead of creating unneccessary churn in git just for policy reasons.","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"91234f50fc48527269a320007a348c3697a24054","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"21a16191_4aa8bc74","updated":"2024-08-09 16:25:55.000000000","message":"Thanks for the engagement here; i\u0027ll get this in and look at the re-proposal","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"15657a9677d601069c46f39ddd0195b036dc5953","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"87ee54dc_9837055b","updated":"2024-08-08 02:28:59.000000000","message":"We have two options on this\n\n1. If same liaisons continuing then -1 from all existing liaisons in this change will be consider as opt-in DPL model for 2025.1\n\n2. If new liaisons coming or existing liaisons are not continuing then a new change on top it to continue DPL model or PTL election.\n\nref: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/925926","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"48664ec575ea2551b1b3c794da453249e99ff952","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"2747ced2_415a89b9","updated":"2024-08-07 03:19:08.000000000","message":"adding existing liaisons in review","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"ff8ca38ed3269842b0574584c22245966c4b8729","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d968873f_07f798fe","updated":"2024-08-09 14:26:27.000000000","message":"hmm, o.k. let\u0027s go with this then for now. also avoids rebasing the whole stack","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"2af3e828afa8e18e5ddaecc072fc787bd4604c23","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"aa217c43_ec60b173","updated":"2024-08-08 18:31:17.000000000","message":"well iiuc the other option would be for all existing liaisons to -1 this change, then it could be abandoned. neither option will work if one of them is unresponsive, which is exactly why this procedure was instanciated: have an explicit check as to whether people are still around","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"91234f50fc48527269a320007a348c3697a24054","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"a10fec40_6514a035","in_reply_to":"72a151d8_bed95120","updated":"2024-08-09 16:25:55.000000000","message":"These are traceable on gerrit too.. but Ghanshyam is updating that note: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/925926","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":28619,"name":"Dmitriy Rabotyagov","email":"noonedeadpunk@gmail.com","username":"noonedeadpunk"},"change_message_id":"f70e4d25f8e3b35c159a49221fff89a0365e1354","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e4035958_a02f89d8","in_reply_to":"74df3b03_d2e5f6ae","updated":"2024-08-08 16:36:55.000000000","message":"Nah, my idea was to re-opt-in for the DPL as defined by the process, so pushed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/925997 to address that.","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"079085b1b5d0b0d4fce33aa7ebf8a0b0d9d743f1","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"74df3b03_d2e5f6ae","in_reply_to":"87ee54dc_9837055b","updated":"2024-08-08 07:20:54.000000000","message":"I\u0027m interpreting Dmitriy\u0027s +1 as an approval to go ahead and have a PTL election, we\u0027ll have to wait and see if that turns out in another leaderless situation, but seems fine to proceed here","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"3b5a0d630b019faa4e76c4c1ff42eba7ae1725a0","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d5e1a49d_d358c206","in_reply_to":"aa217c43_ec60b173","updated":"2024-08-08 18:37:11.000000000","message":"Oh; so @noonedeadpunk@gmail.com is explicitly trying to see if @alsotoes@gmail.com agrees with this reinstatement? \n\nI guess we could just figure that part out here :D","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"f709fd4a2aa0eb8fb439f90883c13e5a58f8283c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"af778e26_2c19642e","in_reply_to":"d5e1a49d_d358c206","updated":"2024-08-08 23:43:29.000000000","message":"Exactly, that is why we defined the process for \u0027explicit reset DPL to keep all liaisons up to date.\u0027 Without that, we can even say liaison ping on IRC or in Gerrit but that process does not work and we can wait for a month to get response. That is why we explicitly reset the DPL and let liaisons either re-adopt DPL or try for PTL.\n\n- https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/distributed-project-leadership.html#dpl-model-liaison-duration","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"c06c6397f2f9b00aaa2a96ebf6eb3c61b3e9a14c","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b929de7c_e5eaae8c","in_reply_to":"e4035958_a02f89d8","updated":"2024-08-08 17:40:07.000000000","message":"/me honestly doesn\u0027t prefer the churn.. :( \n\nWhat\u0027s the point of doing this, and undoing it right away.  `¯\\_(ツ)_/¯`","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":28619,"name":"Dmitriy Rabotyagov","email":"noonedeadpunk@gmail.com","username":"noonedeadpunk"},"change_message_id":"9e2bacca1a0966409a835ffc0e1a4ce6b02a0929","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"72a151d8_bed95120","in_reply_to":"e706c9ea_7f54c8c8","updated":"2024-08-09 08:14:19.000000000","message":"I _think_ that `TC liaison will reset the project team leadership model to PTL and the project team needs to opt-in to the DPL model explicitly with the same or new liaisons` implies the git churn so that such resets/opt-ins were traceable later on.\nOr we need to change/re-phrase the policy.","commit_id":"7c7818054175c7b2436bb6d4d4a53802a8d4bbd7"}]}