)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"b82956ec7cc74d35413424fce6569a774909ece6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b5da94b3_9b7f86b4","updated":"2024-08-07 03:20:32.000000000","message":"Adding existing liaisons in review","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"8633c1c899548705886bca4924e2732bf0322803","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"73046e68_f44340dc","updated":"2024-08-09 16:28:53.000000000","message":"Approved this is being re-proposed and ttx has voted here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/926055","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"773ce3729bed0b1065774fef5434900d17ceed54","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"4130d10a_88d285a1","updated":"2024-08-08 02:29:57.000000000","message":"Basically, we have two options for the DPL reset process.\n\n1. If same liaisons continue then -1 from all existing liaisons in this change will be considered as opt-in DPL model for 2025.1\n\n2. If new liaisons coming or existing liaisons are not continuing then a new change on top it to continue DPL model or PTL election.\n\nref: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/925926","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"},{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"53010600cb0a1d4354d30a74ab6e9dc0bec36cff","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"0f644edc_3a01148a","updated":"2024-08-08 09:08:12.000000000","message":"I\u0027m less active on relmgt so, indeed, putting my name in liaisons list is perhaps not a good idea, but I +1 to give support the choice of my teammates, I remain a core member of this team, though.","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"f04b5a0d76c634d7b490ed7fb751cbcb6eb8ab5b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"c250ea69_42a0f5e8","updated":"2024-08-07 04:58:48.000000000","message":"not sure how the process is expected to be, should existing liaisons -1 this change if they want to keep the DPL model? (which I\u0027m hereby doing for my part)\n\nor would you rather want to see another patch on top of this one that essentially reverts it?\n\ndo all liaisons need to respond or would some subset be enough?","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"609976e89f2762153044d36066668334da739ff5","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"1a9946c0_c4b00f1a","updated":"2024-08-08 07:12:56.000000000","message":"ok, so let\u0027s go ahead with this and then re-group. CR+1 with my release team hat on and RV+1 for TC","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"889ed85a3293b64704c08869511094f19e2e26e9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"4a944aae_676f4e7f","in_reply_to":"147167be_4ec9aa47","updated":"2024-08-07 17:03:45.000000000","message":"replied there also.\n\nFor process (current document), we expect project to propose the DPL model adoption and all liaisons to +1 there. Like Tony is doing for requirement projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/925850/1\n\nI am not against \u0027-1 from all liaisons on reset change\u0027, which can also work, but we can document that explicitly first. But note, this only work when same liaions want to continue (no addition, removal) in same roles. If any changes needed then explicit opt-in in new proposal is good.","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"519a42540d07f0d96556db1de94c098d6c51aa0d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d13cd2f5_0b4811b6","in_reply_to":"4a944aae_676f4e7f","updated":"2024-08-07 17:20:31.000000000","message":"ACK, probably Revert patch is better, as for example Hervé wrote he will have less time and cannot continue as a Rel Mgt DPL, so he probably won\u0027t add back himself. Though we would like to keep him as Rel Mgt core team member with +2+W rights so that he can help time to time o:) So this sounds logical to me.","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"172235fa08ec303799c5855db2762021a96f4a77","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"147167be_4ec9aa47","in_reply_to":"c250ea69_42a0f5e8","updated":"2024-08-07 05:04:26.000000000","message":"I just saw that the same discussion has started for the reqs project, will continue there for now","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"7936576f61ba3d41c615dac8b2f8cc7f589cef4b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"378888ef_c5fb517c","in_reply_to":"d13cd2f5_0b4811b6","updated":"2024-08-07 17:52:01.000000000","message":"ack, for core group, it is all good and that is not related to the DPL liaisons role. DPL liaisons/PTL may/may not be part of the core group and vice versa.","commit_id":"44055e23f06abd9552d96a90190f8f079c44f42e"}]}