)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"98b62d53273949ee36daaa63b42c7deaff2dffe7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b2b4b3ba_83abd0bd","updated":"2024-08-07 03:22:35.000000000","message":"Adding existing liaisons in review","commit_id":"55020afe0fa5778884ca1ba407a2fc13992e3b70"},{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"18557e94edcddb87026f77ef78e5a3bb5e808c9c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e89d59d0_e12e0f9a","updated":"2024-08-08 09:02:32.000000000","message":"Ben is inactive since a will I don\u0027t think we will have answer from him.\nConcerning me, I\u0027m not an oslo anymore an liaison and I won\u0027t volunteer here, either as liaison or PTL.\nIf someone volunteer to become PTL and launchs the related actions then let\u0027s go, else, I think we can reset this patch.","commit_id":"55020afe0fa5778884ca1ba407a2fc13992e3b70"},{"author":{"_account_id":31245,"name":"Daniel Bengtsson","email":"dbengt@redhat.com","username":"damani42"},"change_message_id":"e6b579e2fc73358814b696534216da82a12f0f12","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"a0651f57_3924b726","updated":"2024-08-08 10:50:58.000000000","message":"I\u0027m volunteer so I\u0027m ok to continue with the DPL model policy.","commit_id":"55020afe0fa5778884ca1ba407a2fc13992e3b70"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"c109f956b1679fc4bd9357ce51ec5b7f76ab1243","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ac4f793a_4d92de8f","updated":"2024-08-08 02:30:08.000000000","message":"We have two options for the DPL reset process.\n\n1. If same liaisons continue then -1 from all existing liaisons in this change will be considered as opt-in DPL model for 2025.1\n\n2. If new liaisons coming or existing liaisons are not continuing then a new change on top it to continue DPL model or PTL election.\n\nref: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/925926","commit_id":"55020afe0fa5778884ca1ba407a2fc13992e3b70"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"e81bb53a80506106fd204a9a5d1e22bc6821e117","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3d55c63a_2b70d6c6","updated":"2024-08-08 07:26:20.000000000","message":"this needs a rebase as the parent has been abandoned, but waiting to actually do that as there may still be more movement up the chain\n\ndiscussion in the oslo channel indicates that moving back to PTL may be an option, so fine to proceed with this","commit_id":"55020afe0fa5778884ca1ba407a2fc13992e3b70"},{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"b152a7e0bbf260079e69f2ed705be48ce6340b3b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"24567f22_ed9e79cf","in_reply_to":"369cd7b8_f4eb8408","updated":"2024-08-08 13:55:38.000000000","message":"s/Ben is inactive since a while/","commit_id":"55020afe0fa5778884ca1ba407a2fc13992e3b70"},{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"1bf756cf431d64fcc86cb90c9b46ef3c8218cf1f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"369cd7b8_f4eb8408","in_reply_to":"e89d59d0_e12e0f9a","updated":"2024-08-08 12:05:24.000000000","message":"s/reset/abandon/","commit_id":"55020afe0fa5778884ca1ba407a2fc13992e3b70"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"71a11c85c76fb6989353a7d096ae866d352baa35","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"3be85458_50ffc8f6","updated":"2024-08-15 17:38:23.000000000","message":"Election nomination started it means deadline (as per the policy) are passed and we should merge this. \n\nWhat can be the next step for oslo, it can be discussed in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/926154","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"e99b6d6d842d6f103336e9867adeb074c0fddf7d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"d56062eb_37dbdf2a","updated":"2024-08-08 16:36:18.000000000","message":"rebased, let\u0027s wait if oslo going for PTL model or continue with DPL. For DPL I think only vacant liaison is security liaison and all other liaisons are ok to continue.","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"7e76fd05b33f29e7139d1307f03a705ca768f04c","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"c193e3f0_bfa2084f","in_reply_to":"1e6a80f8_cd11c4f8","updated":"2024-08-19 19:08:25.000000000","message":"I am a little confused with the “unusual” situation here. This is as per the current policy that DPL reset can be held/abandoned if *ALL* liaisons are -1 and not \"if ANY of the liaisons is -1. \n\nThis is as per situation handled in our policy. If you feel this is not good, we should change our policy from \"do not reset state if *ALL* liaisons are -1\"  to \" do not reset state if ANY of the liaisons is -1\"\n\nAnd if you see discussion, Daniel has clearly mentioned that they are ok with either way DPL or PTL but nobody has strongly objected that \"DO NOT RESET DPL STATE\". And that is why we have another change to decide the new leadership model for oslo.\n\nNOTE: The main goal of the DPL reset change policy is to keep ALL the DPL liaisons active. We reset the state for all DPL projects in any situation (except opt-in criteria as defined in the policy) every cycle. If we do not reset the state due to any situation (for example, this one), then we will be stuck like before, and it will be difficult to monitor the DPL project\u0027s active leadership.","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"d897c34e64d743c38e0b496cd94d81d0a4380bdc","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"1e6a80f8_cd11c4f8","in_reply_to":"3be85458_50ffc8f6","updated":"2024-08-16 22:27:55.000000000","message":"yes! but bear with me for this “unusual” situation here..\n\nI’m unsure if damani will express a different opinion here or on the reinstatement patch that Ghanshyam has posted. I want to be cognizant of the fact that the deadlines this time were murky and people are probably taking some summer vacation time away from their computers; probably also because we’re doing this for the first time. thank you for your patience while we iron out the process.\n\nI don’t want to merge this patch yet because it will mean two things:\n\n1) we ignore the -1 from damani \n2) it creates a window of time where Oslo is expecting a PTL; when that’s not the case… \n\nthis is an unnecessary churn when we know people are probably not responding because of the holidays. \n\nI think it’s okay to take the time here and hash out the DPL thing; I would like to get damani’s vote on either patch in the next week before proceeding.\n\nif any TC members disagree; please quote me and add your +1s; I’ll disagree but accept your better judgement and merge this.\n\nthanks!","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"39110172211f678907b520c405da4111c7cdb81a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"b642ca49_cee59f3c","in_reply_to":"73a2ef14_711b5571","updated":"2024-08-09 17:04:51.000000000","message":"ok, I think we can go with the DPL model where all existing liaisons ok to continue the roles except Ben for security liaison, which Danial is ready to take.\n\nDaniel also confirm on oslo channel about taking PTL role. So we are ok in both opiotns here.\n\n@Daniel, can you discuss in oslo and take a call considering the long-term sustainability? and let us know before Monday so that we can update the election  process accordingly.","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"d9cf2aad2a7bb42137d085521b055e551e33dc85","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"eecee99e_d437ea85","in_reply_to":"7d7cb8c6_004d4807","updated":"2024-08-12 16:24:49.000000000","message":"I\u0027m fine with the both directions. I\u0027m fine with being kept as a release liaison and share responsibility, but taking a PTL role (which is basically the single initial contact) is a bit difficult now as I\u0027m no longer dedicated to OpenStack. If Daniel can take care of the PTL role then I also support it.\n\nRegarding the long-term sustainability, I\u0027m unsure what we can immediately discuss. Probably we can consider some rotation based PTL assignment but honestly speaking I\u0027m unsure if any other cores can take the PTL role nowadays considering their less activity these days.","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":31245,"name":"Daniel Bengtsson","email":"dbengt@redhat.com","username":"damani42"},"change_message_id":"e569df44187370de97b425274e0039dcd25c4d4f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"7d7cb8c6_004d4807","in_reply_to":"b642ca49_cee59f3c","updated":"2024-08-12 08:51:46.000000000","message":"For me that works very well and I confirm I can do it.","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":31245,"name":"Daniel Bengtsson","email":"dbengt@redhat.com","username":"damani42"},"change_message_id":"566e7adf63845f73b210b05040a10ca5f221c452","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"73a2ef14_711b5571","in_reply_to":"d56062eb_37dbdf2a","updated":"2024-08-09 14:48:26.000000000","message":"Ok. I can the security liaison.","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"742343d94321628e41913acd2f6c5f696ec9ffc6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"8070edd6_5d213736","in_reply_to":"ee2076dd_597da08d","updated":"2024-08-12 18:25:33.000000000","message":"oslo DPL model opt-in for next cycle https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/926154","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"5432a187d9c4f3b2cce2fdb0e93a4fe436cd9cb6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"ee2076dd_597da08d","in_reply_to":"eecee99e_d437ea85","updated":"2024-08-12 18:19:43.000000000","message":"yeah, you are right. I think as we all ok for DPL liaisons let\u0027s continue that and if we need to shift it to PTL that we can discuss anytime in the next cycle or next term.\n\nI will push the change to continue with the DPL model with updated liaisons.","commit_id":"634145c9cc90e58a82f992c3be83c0cb468182b2"}]}