)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":6488,"name":"Clint Byrum","email":"clint@fewbar.com","username":"clint-fewbar"},"change_message_id":"9bfb6324725a9cac09bd7e8a3253df7f605fa441","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":6,"context_line":""},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"Necessary pep8 fix: assertEquals -\u003e assertEqual"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"Currently blocking https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61276/"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":""},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"Change-Id: I012958e63d9e0efaf36ee57fe9102e835ef8533c"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"Closes-bug: #1218190"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"AAAATn%2F9Toc%3D","line":9,"updated":"2013-12-12 20:07:08.000000000","message":"We typically reference Change-Id\u0027s not review URLs. In theory Change-Id will have more longevity since review.openstack.org may go away but the Change-Id will be in the commit logs forever.\n\nAlso that review will conflict with changes that were manually landed, so that isn\u0027t really a great reason anyway.\n\nI suggest just doing the hacking fix to test-requirements.txt in this change as well, and dropping the reference to the automated review. Even if there is disagreement with this course of action, we should mention the update to hacking 0.8 as the reason for this change anyway, not the other review.","commit_id":"f05d8d647ba2ff8f291d3b154e09fe4e033d3eeb"}]}