)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":4978,"name":"Julie Pichon","email":"jpichon@redhat.com","username":"jpichon"},"change_message_id":"bbecd639195465afd8ffb05b02339fd8a72a176c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":9,"context_line":"We should use ugettext_lazy to let users in different languages"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"get correct translation.Though in views or similar places"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"we can use ugettext with no problems, we should make code"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"style consistent."},{"line_number":13,"context_line":""},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"Fixes: bug #1178722"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":4,"id":"AAAAO3%2F%2F8Q4%3D","line":12,"updated":"2013-05-16 16:19:37.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t think the commit message is entirely accurate, this isn\u0027t a matter of coding style: when not using lazy translations mechanisms, translations can get cached server-side and provide an inconsistent experience to users who may not receive the right language for their locale.","commit_id":"155ee15a3ace3002db57c0b13647860f8f5714b9"},{"author":{"_account_id":4978,"name":"Julie Pichon","email":"jpichon@redhat.com","username":"jpichon"},"change_message_id":"0407b92b91de412d4591c81cbf6c96bb5c94184c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":13,"context_line":""},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"This also fix the issues that the django proxy objects appear on the"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"launching instance page instead of translated strings. Now the"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"translated quota strings are handled correctly."},{"line_number":17,"context_line":""},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"Fixes: bug #1178722"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":6,"id":"AAAAPH%2F%2F%2BSM%3D","line":16,"updated":"2013-05-17 13:56:14.000000000","message":"This paragraph should not be part of the commit message -- this issue only happened because of the patch itself during the review, so it isn\u0027t fixing an existing problem.","commit_id":"f1a9a9451a1e7fcc27e2d4c956686bd25c1e38b1"}]}