)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":4571,"name":"Steve Baker","email":"sbaker@redhat.com","username":"steve-stevebaker"},"change_message_id":"d71f8513d59e9f1b3d0c0985eca79f90e452f9a7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"968a0572_01788b20","updated":"2023-05-19 03:28:29.000000000","message":"I would consider this a bug, the ironic-ramdisk-base element doesn\u0027t respond to the DIB_CHECKSUM variable like diskimage-builder\u0027s ramdisk element or any other single file image built by diskimage-builder. Checksums are important to every part of the distribution pipeline and I think there is a reasonable expectation that DIB_CHECKSUM should behave as documented in all cases.","commit_id":"722d078f544f9f489d41e215c8c0d8dc6aedc2ee"},{"author":{"_account_id":10342,"name":"Jay Faulkner","display_name":"JayF","email":"jay@jvf.cc","username":"JayF","status":"youtube.com/@oss-gr / podcast.gr-oss.io"},"change_message_id":"d475a1536f0c6a0d5cc19006c41a7748e2bce5ed","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3432f99a_3d074c85","updated":"2023-05-19 18:23:42.000000000","message":"Thanks Steve for the explanation.","commit_id":"722d078f544f9f489d41e215c8c0d8dc6aedc2ee"},{"author":{"_account_id":10342,"name":"Jay Faulkner","display_name":"JayF","email":"jay@jvf.cc","username":"JayF","status":"youtube.com/@oss-gr / podcast.gr-oss.io"},"change_message_id":"933215a28a82e9ff2d671065597125e432df94b7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"92cefd1a_fecbe0d3","updated":"2023-05-18 21:07:40.000000000","message":"We typically don\u0027t backport features except when hardware support requires it; why should this be different?","commit_id":"722d078f544f9f489d41e215c8c0d8dc6aedc2ee"}]}