)]}'
{"specs/approved/network-provider.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":13997,"name":"SHIGEMATSU Mitsuhiro","email":"shigematsu.mitsuhiro@lab.ntt.co.jp","username":"pshige"},"change_message_id":"4e03870b104f7b4fb9c2f76e731efa322ce665a8","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":90,"context_line":"  info, do nothing. If binding failed due to missing switchport information,"},{"line_number":91,"context_line":"  Ironic should update the port appropriately and allow it to be bound."},{"line_number":92,"context_line":""},{"line_number":93,"context_line":"* The node is using the \u0027none\u0027 network provider. In this casee, the node"},{"line_number":94,"context_line":"  is expected to be on the provisioning network after deployment (today\u0027s"},{"line_number":95,"context_line":"  current model). In this case, the ports should be treated as they are today,"},{"line_number":96,"context_line":"  putting DHCP configs on those ports, etc."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"1a4dcd0f_735ca819","line":93,"updated":"2015-08-14 18:07:07.000000000","message":"s/casee/case/","commit_id":"ad6334569e544c65ae9e3fae3d2962147a00cc43"}]}