)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":9315,"name":"ramesh","email":"rameshg87@gmail.com","username":"rameshg87"},"change_message_id":"81bfd94a1672ae799c53901e173a4c4f53ec369c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":12,"context_line":""},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"Instead use only self.__class__._hash_rings to be consistent. This"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"should be less confusing. Before the reader had to know the scoping"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"rules and that reading self._hash_rings was actually reading"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"self.__class__._hash_rings. But assigning to self._hash_rings would"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"create a new instance variable instead of updating the class level"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"self.__class__._hash_rings."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":4,"id":"3a29b11f_68fdddaf","line":15,"updated":"2015-10-23 07:20:09.000000000","message":"Reading getting to know the scoping rules is a good thing for the reader :)","commit_id":"3821db03b5eea9454f02ada676580ed86231b7f7"}]}