)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":13039,"name":"Martin André","email":"m.andre@redhat.com","username":"mandre"},"change_message_id":"3fe9ac87ccffd94295d09a8c5df9899159f84797","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"152a722f_4ef966e9","updated":"2022-09-24 07:04:46.000000000","message":"Hi Julia, could you review this small patch?\n\nThe last change (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/843515) didn\u0027t completely fix stable/ussuri. We\u0027re still seeing issues in the gophercloud CI:\nhttps://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/actions/runs/3116737939/jobs/5054835470\n\nThat\u0027s odd, because I\u0027m pretty sure I tested my patch at the time. Oh, well... Anyway, this time it should work with a git tag.","commit_id":"399aa37b6d5ffd45d8047470a4c9706c73834391"},{"author":{"_account_id":13039,"name":"Martin André","email":"m.andre@redhat.com","username":"mandre"},"change_message_id":"928e6cab1117f74f01e55f4c84a6e2c1324d209f","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e541943c_c462ff56","in_reply_to":"152a722f_4ef966e9","updated":"2022-09-26 05:46:10.000000000","message":"Also, why pinning virtualbmc to 2.2.0 in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/843515\u003e, while 2.2.2 is the latest one supporting python 3.6?\nAlso, not sure why 2.2.0 doesn\u0027t show up in https://opendev.org/openstack/virtualbmc/tags/","commit_id":"399aa37b6d5ffd45d8047470a4c9706c73834391"},{"author":{"_account_id":11655,"name":"Julia Kreger","email":"juliaashleykreger@gmail.com","username":"jkreger","status":"Flying to the moon with a Jetpack!"},"change_message_id":"363b6065f14a0d43572764f31e793eea68d88c03","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"6a7a4dab_509448c0","in_reply_to":"e541943c_c462ff56","updated":"2022-09-26 21:14:12.000000000","message":"Ugh, what fun. The way the clone is triggered it can\u0027t use a tag. Thanks devstack!\n\nI don\u0027t remember why 2.2.0 and not 2.2. I might have just mentally disqualified it from the time window. Regardless, locally tested it appears this is good. I\u0027m going to single core approve this as it makes sense to me.","commit_id":"399aa37b6d5ffd45d8047470a4c9706c73834391"}]}