)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":10342,"name":"Jay Faulkner","display_name":"JayF","email":"jay@jvf.cc","username":"JayF","status":"youtube.com/@oss-gr / podcast.gr-oss.io"},"change_message_id":"e8a635094bea3ca3e4ebdeb9f5730ae7cfd1e9d5","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b7c1175d_c3b9d0b6","updated":"2025-03-28 00:47:47.000000000","message":"The tests failed as expected; but the errors they threw look a little obtuse -- is there anything we can do to make it more clear at a glance what is broken?","commit_id":"b3a67ecee9a65f36bd4c29d57767355c97d8c10b"},{"author":{"_account_id":36102,"name":"Adam McArthur","display_name":"Adam McArthur","email":"adam@mcaq.me","username":"adamcarthur","status":"PhD Candidate in Computational Imaging. Open Source Software Engineer at G-Research."},"change_message_id":"73ed63ccb4a11d52121f4f38e3f3d0a505bf0c37","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"6cda7922_251f0a4d","in_reply_to":"29eed457_89464539","updated":"2025-03-31 08:31:30.000000000","message":"We now get \"AssertionError: Request for microversion 1.42 for create_allocation raised unexpected exception: Request for microversion 1.42 for create_allocation unexpectedly succeeded. We expected UnexpectedResponseCode.\"","commit_id":"b3a67ecee9a65f36bd4c29d57767355c97d8c10b"},{"author":{"_account_id":10342,"name":"Jay Faulkner","display_name":"JayF","email":"jay@jvf.cc","username":"JayF","status":"youtube.com/@oss-gr / podcast.gr-oss.io"},"change_message_id":"d055359ea2f48e8a14c793f29849b175c5befd9b","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"29eed457_89464539","in_reply_to":"3bf4f134_b610dea6","updated":"2025-03-28 21:39:19.000000000","message":"Just something as simple as \"Request for microversion $version returned $code for $endpoint; we expected $code\" would be ideal IMO","commit_id":"b3a67ecee9a65f36bd4c29d57767355c97d8c10b"},{"author":{"_account_id":36102,"name":"Adam McArthur","display_name":"Adam McArthur","email":"adam@mcaq.me","username":"adamcarthur","status":"PhD Candidate in Computational Imaging. Open Source Software Engineer at G-Research."},"change_message_id":"3a17f530179b6ddaead7c79a5554f6f9daf7aba1","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3bf4f134_b610dea6","in_reply_to":"b7c1175d_c3b9d0b6","updated":"2025-03-28 21:28:29.000000000","message":"Yeah, we should be able to by changing what is shown in https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_d6c/openstack/d6cd6d6d422b4483b27ac390224d9995/testr_results.html\n\nI can change it to say instead of mismatch, print clearly what a mismatch means, which is that the client call worked, even though it shouldn\u0027t have.","commit_id":"b3a67ecee9a65f36bd4c29d57767355c97d8c10b"}]}