)]}'
{"releasenotes/notes/redfish-inspect-processor-2467118e869a2915.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":10342,"name":"Jay Faulkner","display_name":"JayF","email":"jay@jvf.cc","username":"JayF","status":"youtube.com/@oss-gr / podcast.gr-oss.io"},"change_message_id":"62366e014005f6f5d60cb2bfa062c85470db3b71","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":2,"context_line":"upgrade:"},{"line_number":3,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":4,"context_line":"    When using the redfish inspection method, the node property ``cpus`` will no"},{"line_number":5,"context_line":"    longer be populated. No other inspection method populated this field."},{"line_number":6,"context_line":"fixes:"},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":"    When using the redfish inspection method, the node property ``cpu_arch`` is"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":9,"id":"7c782297_3b4fc64d","line":5,"updated":"2025-08-06 22:52:49.000000000","message":"Can we do this? I think it\u0027s technically an API break, but I\u0027m OK with it.","commit_id":"5a8312fefabf8567d72195dd7327cc16527d8e7b"},{"author":{"_account_id":11655,"name":"Julia Kreger","email":"juliaashleykreger@gmail.com","username":"jkreger","status":"Flying to the moon with a Jetpack!"},"change_message_id":"711f3f2e144ae8c4b67b7107f1f26f87ba26f487","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":2,"context_line":"upgrade:"},{"line_number":3,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":4,"context_line":"    When using the redfish inspection method, the node property ``cpus`` will no"},{"line_number":5,"context_line":"    longer be populated. No other inspection method populated this field."},{"line_number":6,"context_line":"fixes:"},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":"    When using the redfish inspection method, the node property ``cpu_arch`` is"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":9,"id":"d1166109_01686bf5","line":5,"in_reply_to":"7c782297_3b4fc64d","updated":"2025-08-14 14:26:32.000000000","message":"Looks like nova tries to read it, if it doesn\u0027t find it it fills in 0, but never actually uses the value. In fact, internally it tracks and replaces only vcpus which it just substitutes in with a 0 value anyway.\n\nThat all goes back to the shift from quantitative to qualitative scheduling and Ironic keeping it around for *ages* later *really* just was us extending long term interoperability with nova. For anyone else, this is sort of a reasonable note in the event they are using it.","commit_id":"5a8312fefabf8567d72195dd7327cc16527d8e7b"}]}