)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":5890,"name":"Doug Goldstein","email":"cardoe@cardoe.com","username":"cardoe"},"change_message_id":"a62ff545c53e964beafaeb0a484bb6f23f9f049c","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"bb4c7a7e_f4963678","updated":"2025-11-01 20:04:38.000000000","message":"Did you write this yourself or use a LLM to do this? If you used an LLM please add Assisted-by: \u003cwhat you used\u003e\n\nYou caught one spot where the grammar is wrong but you added a few incorrect spots.\n\nYou reference documentation standards in your commit message. What standards? Cause you\u0027re just rewording heading in a number of places but what standard does that adhere to?","commit_id":"4146dc12e1b077eca7186f9dae6acaba7e8b3c67"},{"author":{"_account_id":10342,"name":"Jay Faulkner","display_name":"JayF","email":"jay@jvf.cc","username":"JayF","status":"youtube.com/@oss-gr / podcast.gr-oss.io"},"change_message_id":"0afe70199ea27dc5840c8de85ec3fee96ce1b96d","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"cc75d5df_a709ed60","in_reply_to":"bb4c7a7e_f4963678","updated":"2025-11-06 15:58:47.000000000","message":"The standards he\u0027s talking about are in a bug that\u0027s not associated here. This is an attempt, I think, to implement some of the docs audit stuff.\n\nI agree entirely with your assessment that this needs more (human?) editing for clarity. Especially changing to e.g. \"The Inspection Process\" as headings seems really strange to me.\n\nAbhijith needs to:\n- Ensure he has Related-bug: or Closes-bug: in the commit to show what he\u0027s doing and\n- Re-read the final output, and edit it for additional clarity. As it sits, I don\u0027t think this doc change is an improvement.","commit_id":"4146dc12e1b077eca7186f9dae6acaba7e8b3c67"},{"author":{"_account_id":38525,"name":"Abhijith P C","email":"abhijithpc25@gmail.com","username":"abhijith00777"},"change_message_id":"854735e625a43972547ac88911f7a4821efa8435","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"4bca6741_545da63b","in_reply_to":"cc75d5df_a709ed60","updated":"2025-11-29 17:09:40.000000000","message":"Thanks for the feedback. I\u0027ve added the Assisted-by tag, bug reference, removed verbose headings, and focused only on grammar fixes, removed headings like \"The Inspection Process\", and kept the original simple structure. The revised version maintains the original document structure","commit_id":"4146dc12e1b077eca7186f9dae6acaba7e8b3c67"},{"author":{"_account_id":4571,"name":"Steve Baker","email":"sbaker@redhat.com","username":"steve-stevebaker"},"change_message_id":"287ceb4b4d6651a52d7e8a10ffd969a6bed5b8c9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"9bc6d949_42e6c7c7","updated":"2025-11-28 03:18:25.000000000","message":"Other than one indentation issue this looks fine","commit_id":"a9b4f6524e212b4bc7fcfdafd070ba72abe9de68"}],"doc/source/user/states.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":4571,"name":"Steve Baker","email":"sbaker@redhat.com","username":"steve-stevebaker"},"change_message_id":"287ceb4b4d6651a52d7e8a10ffd969a6bed5b8c9","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":150,"context_line":"    deployed. The difference is that in ``wait call-back`` the conductor is"},{"line_number":151,"context_line":"    waiting for the ramdisk to boot or execute parts of the deployment that"},{"line_number":152,"context_line":"    need to run in-band on the node (for example, installing the bootloader, or"},{"line_number":153,"context_line":"    writing the image to the disk)."},{"line_number":154,"context_line":""},{"line_number":155,"context_line":"  The deployment of a node in ``wait call-back`` can be interrupted by setting"},{"line_number":156,"context_line":"  the node\u0027s provision state using the ``deleted`` or ``undeploy`` verbs."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"c97f0bd7_95667d24","line":153,"updated":"2025-11-28 03:18:25.000000000","message":"It looks like the indentation on this section should be reverted","commit_id":"a9b4f6524e212b4bc7fcfdafd070ba72abe9de68"},{"author":{"_account_id":38525,"name":"Abhijith P C","email":"abhijithpc25@gmail.com","username":"abhijith00777"},"change_message_id":"854735e625a43972547ac88911f7a4821efa8435","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":150,"context_line":"    deployed. The difference is that in ``wait call-back`` the conductor is"},{"line_number":151,"context_line":"    waiting for the ramdisk to boot or execute parts of the deployment that"},{"line_number":152,"context_line":"    need to run in-band on the node (for example, installing the bootloader, or"},{"line_number":153,"context_line":"    writing the image to the disk)."},{"line_number":154,"context_line":""},{"line_number":155,"context_line":"  The deployment of a node in ``wait call-back`` can be interrupted by setting"},{"line_number":156,"context_line":"  the node\u0027s provision state using the ``deleted`` or ``undeploy`` verbs."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"fc172ab1_76fdd0b2","line":153,"in_reply_to":"c97f0bd7_95667d24","updated":"2025-11-29 17:09:40.000000000","message":"Thanks for the review! I\u0027ve corrected the indentation issue on the new patch set","commit_id":"a9b4f6524e212b4bc7fcfdafd070ba72abe9de68"}]}