)]}'
{"ansible/roles/ironic-inspector-rules/library/os_ironic_inspector_rule.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":30491,"name":"Radosław Piliszek","display_name":"Radek","email":"radek@piliszek.it","username":"yoctozepto","status":"self-employed techologist, collaborating mostly with 7bulls.com"},"change_message_id":"4fd073724feaa880f6962a16be2c32125004f5a6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":114,"context_line":"                        condition.setdefault(\u0027invert\u0027, False)"},{"line_number":115,"context_line":"                        condition.setdefault(\u0027multiple\u0027, \u0027any\u0027)"},{"line_number":116,"context_line":"                if rule[key] !\u003d expected:"},{"line_number":117,"context_line":"                    module.fail_json(msg\u003d\"%s !\u003d %s\" % (rule[key], expected)"},{"line_number":118,"context_line":"                    break"},{"line_number":119,"context_line":"            else:"},{"line_number":120,"context_line":"                # Nothing to do - rule exists and is as requested."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"1fa4df85_6bb7a3f6","line":117,"updated":"2020-03-10 17:32:54.000000000","message":"missing ) at the very end)","commit_id":"0314e6ce0eb4104ea417893caf356f9939d13301"}],"releasenotes/notes/fix-inspector-rule-idempotency-f6e5a61f7dca580f.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":30491,"name":"Radosław Piliszek","display_name":"Radek","email":"radek@piliszek.it","username":"yoctozepto","status":"self-employed techologist, collaborating mostly with 7bulls.com"},"change_message_id":"e3d0437457bef3c45431de01058dfbbeffcc265f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1,"context_line":"---"},{"line_number":2,"context_line":"fixes:"},{"line_number":3,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":4,"context_line":"    Fixes an issue with idempotency of Ironic Inspector rule creation. See"},{"line_number":5,"context_line":"    `story 2007399 \u003chttps://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007399\u003e`__ for"},{"line_number":6,"context_line":"    details."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"1fa4df85_cb9c976b","line":6,"range":{"start_line":4,"start_character":71,"end_line":6,"end_character":12},"updated":"2020-03-10 17:34:37.000000000","message":"non-issue: I find your way overly verbose. Would not you like just postfixing with \"LP#12345\" or \"Story 12345\"? (also not sure if \"Task 12345\" would not be helpful too)","commit_id":"0314e6ce0eb4104ea417893caf356f9939d13301"},{"author":{"_account_id":14826,"name":"Mark Goddard","email":"markgoddard86@gmail.com","username":"mgoddard"},"change_message_id":"3519c051b623bd40a1fb07fe8fbd8b1b92395f2b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1,"context_line":"---"},{"line_number":2,"context_line":"fixes:"},{"line_number":3,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":4,"context_line":"    Fixes an issue with idempotency of Ironic Inspector rule creation. See"},{"line_number":5,"context_line":"    `story 2007399 \u003chttps://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007399\u003e`__ for"},{"line_number":6,"context_line":"    details."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"1fa4df85_8b08df91","line":6,"range":{"start_line":4,"start_character":71,"end_line":6,"end_character":12},"in_reply_to":"1fa4df85_cb9c976b","updated":"2020-03-10 17:39:13.000000000","message":"We should probably standardise. I don\u0027t really mind. I use this to keep to proper sentences. Some kind of formatting might keep the grammar nazi happy e.g. [story 12345]","commit_id":"0314e6ce0eb4104ea417893caf356f9939d13301"}]}