)]}'
{"keystoneauth1/loading/base.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":17860,"name":"Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz","email":"samueldmq@gmail.com","username":"samueldmq"},"change_message_id":"b0429fc0f2dcaad1bc38caf155c0bec701982f95","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":73,"context_line":"    loaders \u003d dict(mgr.map(lambda ext: (ext.entry_point.name, ext.obj)))"},{"line_number":74,"context_line":""},{"line_number":75,"context_line":"    for k, v in _ADDITIONAL_LOADERS.items():"},{"line_number":76,"context_line":"        loaders[k] \u003d _additional_loader(v)"},{"line_number":77,"context_line":""},{"line_number":78,"context_line":"    return loaders"},{"line_number":79,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":4,"id":"ba5201f7_187af724","line":76,"range":{"start_line":76,"start_character":8,"end_line":76,"end_character":42},"updated":"2017-01-02 23:17:52.000000000","message":"this allows overriding current loaders with custom provided loaders, does this make sense/is something desirable ?\n\nEDIT: perhaps this is what we want. There is a test called test_additional_loaders_overload","commit_id":"d0cc86e969919d25683a9a2602f18c0791234902"}]}
