)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":1916,"name":"Guang Yee","email":"gyee@suse.com","username":"guang-yee"},"change_message_id":"80e89102d0dba2aff6af1ec24845420df02bfbaa","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":29,"context_line":"Although I think something like \u0027domain-admins\u0027 is probably the most"},{"line_number":30,"context_line":"appropriate, I definitely want to steer far away from anything that"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"might convey that we fully support multi-tenant \"admin\" isolation in any"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"form (i.e. \"admin\"-ness not properly scoped per tenant as expected)."},{"line_number":33,"context_line":""},{"line_number":34,"context_line":"Change-Id: I1fc3b0b79f1c300a7c32a309dd7c4b0d0716afac"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":2,"id":"3afb71cf_570f5ae1","line":32,"updated":"2015-06-05 15:47:41.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t understand the we don\u0027t fully support multi-tenant \"admin\" isolation part. That policy should be capable of facilitating \"domain admin\" functionality.","commit_id":"2b49c52a650e6395fbd086f5d346bb8f0511d19c"}],"doc/source/configuration.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":6486,"name":"Brant Knudson","email":"blk@acm.org","username":"blk-u"},"change_message_id":"0d9aa8a909e8f32f189535857bc39dd97d8ef6cd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1228,"context_line":"API protection, and does not assume any particular use of domains. For"},{"line_number":1229,"context_line":"multi-domain configuration installations where, for example, a cloud provider"},{"line_number":1230,"context_line":"wishes to allow administration of the contents of a domain to be delegated, it"},{"line_number":1231,"context_line":"is recommended that the supplied ``policy.future.json`` is used as a basis for"},{"line_number":1232,"context_line":"creating a suitable production policy file. This example policy file also shows"},{"line_number":1233,"context_line":"the use of an admin_domain to allow a cloud provider to enable cloud"},{"line_number":1234,"context_line":"administrators to have wider access across the APIs."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"3afb71cf_52198c78","line":1231,"updated":"2015-06-07 14:05:18.000000000","message":"how about policy.domainadmin.template.json ?","commit_id":"2b49c52a650e6395fbd086f5d346bb8f0511d19c"},{"author":{"_account_id":6486,"name":"Brant Knudson","email":"blk@acm.org","username":"blk-u"},"change_message_id":"0d9aa8a909e8f32f189535857bc39dd97d8ef6cd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1236,"context_line":"A clean installation would need to perhaps start with the standard policy file,"},{"line_number":1237,"context_line":"to allow creation of the admin_domain with the first users within it. The"},{"line_number":1238,"context_line":"domain_id of the admin domain would then be obtained and could be pasted into a"},{"line_number":1239,"context_line":"modified version of ``policy.future.json`` which could then be enabled as the"},{"line_number":1240,"context_line":"main policy file."},{"line_number":1241,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1242,"context_line":".. _`prepare your deployment`:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"3afb71cf_324e1070","line":1239,"updated":"2015-06-07 14:05:18.000000000","message":"change \"modified\" to \"production\" ?\n\nIf \"production\" is used then I\u0027d remove everything after and including \"which could...\"","commit_id":"2b49c52a650e6395fbd086f5d346bb8f0511d19c"}]}