)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"24fbc22bf5a7523032a81f83a6a863dc11d6d62e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b77a4430_297780bf","updated":"2026-10-10 06:45:32.000000000","message":"py-pure-client is a huge module, it will increase the default size of the image significantly. also why should everpure be different from every other hardware backend that cinder supports?\n\nI would agree to adding the extra variable - we use the same mechanism downstream - but it should be empty by default","commit_id":"7ca9df0aa8e23d5dd08b3981dcad996a5cce39ad"},{"author":{"_account_id":13425,"name":"Simon Dodsley","email":"simon@everpuredata.com","username":"sdodsley"},"change_message_id":"7a0db305d3f79291d2ce080d72cf801482e985e3","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"be500225_ff78e98b","in_reply_to":"b77a4430_297780bf","updated":"2026-10-10 13:39:28.000000000","message":"I accept yor comment on the size - I\u0027m working with our SDK team to get the size reduced. \nI will respon this to have the default as empty and update the docs accordingly","commit_id":"7ca9df0aa8e23d5dd08b3981dcad996a5cce39ad"},{"author":{"_account_id":22629,"name":"Michal Nasiadka","email":"mnasiadka@gmail.com","username":"mnasiadka"},"change_message_id":"71861f2a178de5caf44f1e29c94b068e17dc2862","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"c9188f57_94f8a773","updated":"2026-10-27 11:11:51.000000000","message":"I\u0027d say I\u0027m fine, given the repo AI policy this is not a substantial change - so let\u0027s go with it.","commit_id":"4cefbac5792781e02453cd882c2872dbba371197"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"7c7abbeef1258229515a0eab14b21520d0cee100","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"1df1cf34_853d1868","updated":"2026-10-12 07:45:31.000000000","message":"thx for the update, I\u0027d still prefer a more neutral wording for the reno and commit message, but maybe let\u0027s see what other reviewers think first","commit_id":"4cefbac5792781e02453cd882c2872dbba371197"}]}