)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":18816,"name":"Maurice Escher","display_name":"carthaca","email":"maurice.escher@sap.com","username":"mapocace"},"change_message_id":"f1ba51c5ea5e42bc70dd53f7944d82ffc901a044","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"7249bdf6_f96d4cad","updated":"2026-06-29 15:33:40.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t know about the timing - I hope it is okay to bring up a lite spec at this point in the release. Anyway we (SAP) are fine, if this can only land in I-release.\n\nI have another small comment inline","commit_id":"4906fb12108e2583df3d45632a2996204152d515"},{"author":{"_account_id":38059,"name":"Anoop Kumar Shukla","display_name":"Anoop Shukla","email":"anoop.shukla@netapp.com","username":"anoop2","status":"NetApp"},"change_message_id":"733c926c9731830ecda2aa6d462fc64e3090ef8b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"16860d9f_e9e4f1c0","updated":"2026-07-01 19:39:39.000000000","message":"Please take a look at the comment.","commit_id":"4906fb12108e2583df3d45632a2996204152d515"},{"author":{"_account_id":38910,"name":"Nikita Skakun","display_name":"Nikita","email":"nikita.skakun@sap.com","username":"nikita-skakun"},"change_message_id":"373f0e4c9f58aed758dd235669edf4a5631f90ed","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"8fde4e22_aadf8dbc","in_reply_to":"7249bdf6_f96d4cad","updated":"2026-07-08 12:48:17.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"4906fb12108e2583df3d45632a2996204152d515"}],"specs/unimplemented/spec-lite-mount-point-name-for-share-replicas.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":18816,"name":"Maurice Escher","display_name":"carthaca","email":"maurice.escher@sap.com","username":"mapocace"},"change_message_id":"f1ba51c5ea5e42bc70dd53f7944d82ffc901a044","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":29,"context_line":""},{"line_number":30,"context_line":"           Share drivers that already respect ``mount_point_name`` in"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"           ``create_share()`` must apply the same logic in"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"           ``create_replica()``, ensuring the volume junction path matches"},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"           the parent share."},{"line_number":34,"context_line":""},{"line_number":35,"context_line":":impacts:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"859ab343_dddc5689","line":32,"range":{"start_line":32,"start_character":46,"end_line":32,"end_character":61},"updated":"2026-06-29 15:33:40.000000000","message":"```suggestion\n           ``create_replica()``, ensuring the export location path matches\n```\n\njunction path is driver specific wording","commit_id":"4906fb12108e2583df3d45632a2996204152d515"},{"author":{"_account_id":38910,"name":"Nikita Skakun","display_name":"Nikita","email":"nikita.skakun@sap.com","username":"nikita-skakun"},"change_message_id":"373f0e4c9f58aed758dd235669edf4a5631f90ed","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":29,"context_line":""},{"line_number":30,"context_line":"           Share drivers that already respect ``mount_point_name`` in"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"           ``create_share()`` must apply the same logic in"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"           ``create_replica()``, ensuring the volume junction path matches"},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"           the parent share."},{"line_number":34,"context_line":""},{"line_number":35,"context_line":":impacts:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"0781b86b_c1a2c866","line":32,"range":{"start_line":32,"start_character":46,"end_line":32,"end_character":61},"in_reply_to":"859ab343_dddc5689","updated":"2026-07-08 12:48:17.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"4906fb12108e2583df3d45632a2996204152d515"},{"author":{"_account_id":38059,"name":"Anoop Kumar Shukla","display_name":"Anoop Shukla","email":"anoop.shukla@netapp.com","username":"anoop2","status":"NetApp"},"change_message_id":"733c926c9731830ecda2aa6d462fc64e3090ef8b","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":"           - REST API Impact:"},{"line_number":38,"context_line":"               - A new microversion is required. The behavior of"},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"                 ``POST /v2/share-replicas`` changes: the created replica"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"                 will now have the same export path as the parent share."},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"               - No new request or response parameters are added."},{"line_number":42,"context_line":""},{"line_number":43,"context_line":"           - Driver Impact:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"7c3e467c_a90e00db","line":40,"range":{"start_line":40,"start_character":35,"end_line":40,"end_character":71},"updated":"2026-07-01 19:39:39.000000000","message":"Cant there be a use case where the mount point on destination may be different than what is on source side? Also, this is also platform dependent. Some storages may just use the mount path from source while creating the replica volume. So in such cases this becomes a no-op?","commit_id":"4906fb12108e2583df3d45632a2996204152d515"},{"author":{"_account_id":38059,"name":"Anoop Kumar Shukla","display_name":"Anoop Shukla","email":"anoop.shukla@netapp.com","username":"anoop2","status":"NetApp"},"change_message_id":"6aad5d10373840290eddfe4f8cae08fa86c9fe60","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":"           - REST API Impact:"},{"line_number":38,"context_line":"               - A new microversion is required. The behavior of"},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"                 ``POST /v2/share-replicas`` changes: the created replica"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"                 will now have the same export path as the parent share."},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"               - No new request or response parameters are added."},{"line_number":42,"context_line":""},{"line_number":43,"context_line":"           - Driver Impact:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"2753bd49_b0ee6279","line":40,"range":{"start_line":40,"start_character":35,"end_line":40,"end_character":71},"in_reply_to":"39e63042_9f68064c","updated":"2026-07-07 09:39:42.000000000","message":"Thanks for the insights Maurice. Agreed that this should be documented as future work. We should documentation the use case where its a no-op if storage replicates the mount path on secondary replica.","commit_id":"4906fb12108e2583df3d45632a2996204152d515"},{"author":{"_account_id":18816,"name":"Maurice Escher","display_name":"carthaca","email":"maurice.escher@sap.com","username":"mapocace"},"change_message_id":"ec23e9523fbb3c713f39e6434e677afa140455df","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":"           - REST API Impact:"},{"line_number":38,"context_line":"               - A new microversion is required. The behavior of"},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"                 ``POST /v2/share-replicas`` changes: the created replica"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"                 will now have the same export path as the parent share."},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"               - No new request or response parameters are added."},{"line_number":42,"context_line":""},{"line_number":43,"context_line":"           - Driver Impact:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"39e63042_9f68064c","line":40,"range":{"start_line":40,"start_character":35,"end_line":40,"end_character":71},"in_reply_to":"7c3e467c_a90e00db","updated":"2026-07-02 07:19:11.000000000","message":"Different mount point on destination can be a future improvement, not in scope here.\nI don\u0027t see a problem with the no-op, such drivers can just ignore the mount_point_name param on create_replica() and still report mount_point_name_support.","commit_id":"4906fb12108e2583df3d45632a2996204152d515"}]}