)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"688d8fd7410f6a6c5af110086fe2afde7596ac42","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"607f93e4_98980d67","updated":"2025-09-11 18:00:26.000000000","message":"I\u0027ll leave the comment open for further discussion","commit_id":"9effba1fad65583794a05e19672ed7f9b1c3735a"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"9e1adb19771421fb9f7ec53092d3fd869032cf50","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"a971d1eb_c397997b","updated":"2025-09-11 17:22:16.000000000","message":"Thank you @kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com\n\nWe were/are returning this as \u0027x-compute-request-id\u0027. We\u0027ll have to retain that for backwards compatibility though.. wdyt?","commit_id":"9effba1fad65583794a05e19672ed7f9b1c3735a"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"0e2672818039e11385ed3465b030b6da91c344f8","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"a87681e5_c39adbbe","in_reply_to":"06e6ad73_8c2846dc","updated":"2025-10-20 20:05:15.000000000","message":"++ Agree, we\u0027ll just retain that for applications/users that may be expecting it. Regarding the microversion bump - i\u0027m not in favor of it, but, we can write up an upgrade release note to call attention to it. Sending extra duplicate/data shouldn\u0027t fail anything. This sort of thing was always possible with web server tweaks..","commit_id":"9effba1fad65583794a05e19672ed7f9b1c3735a"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"898449082f86e29a52b4921add0f1fb05cb999d6","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"06e6ad73_8c2846dc","in_reply_to":"a971d1eb_c397997b","updated":"2025-09-12 01:18:28.000000000","message":"Oh, sorry I overlooked it. This change does not remove x-compute-request-id but adds x-openstack-request-id which is more globally used. These two return the same value though.\n\nI think it\u0027s still useful to add the generic one for interoperability. It seems the x-compute-request-id was imported from nova but even nova added x-openstack-request-id.\n\nMy question would be whether we required microversion for adding the header, seeing nova did. (though I feel like that\u0027s too much)","commit_id":"9effba1fad65583794a05e19672ed7f9b1c3735a"}]}