)]}'
{"mistral/engine/workflows.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":21970,"name":"Andras Kovi","email":"akovi@nokia.com","username":"andras.kovi"},"change_message_id":"3e4929800821527297e97de93c938e9d68946dea","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":553,"context_line":"        if self.wf_ex.state \u003d\u003d states.SUCCESS:"},{"line_number":554,"context_line":"            # The result of the sub workflow is already saved"},{"line_number":555,"context_line":"            # so there\u0027s no need to send it over RPC."},{"line_number":556,"context_line":"            result \u003d None"},{"line_number":557,"context_line":"        elif self.wf_ex.state \u003d\u003d states.ERROR:"},{"line_number":558,"context_line":"            err_msg \u003d ("},{"line_number":559,"context_line":"                self.wf_ex.state_info or"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":6,"id":"5fc1f717_b71475ea","line":556,"range":{"start_line":556,"start_character":12,"end_line":556,"end_character":25},"updated":"2019-04-08 08:23:09.000000000","message":"I feel like instead of using None, Result should be updated to support this type of value. Maybe add a field: fetch_from_action_execution\u003d\u003caex_id\u003e. Or it can be a bool too; however, by using the ID, the Result can be more self-contained (describe the semantics of the data)","commit_id":"9238909e0866a9811cd3bb4185ec856fbd812697"}]}