)]}'
{"specs/approved/dynamic-portgroups.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":24828,"name":"Kaifeng Wang","email":"kaifeng.w@gmail.com","username":"wangkf"},"change_message_id":"028eb7f03222e4e75dcf398bd925e949bd993ade","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":"Dynamic port groups"},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":""},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-generic-switch/+bug/1752479"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":""},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"In the Ocata release, Ironic added support for grouping ports into port groups."},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"The administrator also has the ability to specify ``mode`` and ``properties``"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"9f6a8fd7_efd63cf2","line":11,"range":{"start_line":11,"start_character":0,"end_line":11,"end_character":65},"updated":"2018-04-17 00:39:37.000000000","message":"nit: please update with storyboard link.","commit_id":"2f5ade4dd1595966314e0bb6b41ed574a3285961"},{"author":{"_account_id":24828,"name":"Kaifeng Wang","email":"kaifeng.w@gmail.com","username":"wangkf"},"change_message_id":"028eb7f03222e4e75dcf398bd925e949bd993ade","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":24,"context_line":""},{"line_number":25,"context_line":"While Ironic provides the ability to create port groups with different"},{"line_number":26,"context_line":"configurations (mode and properties), port groups still have to be pre-created"},{"line_number":27,"context_line":"on ToR manually as we do not pass port group details to ML2 drivers."},{"line_number":28,"context_line":"To make port groups creation ``dynamic`` Ironic should pass port group settings"},{"line_number":29,"context_line":"to Neutron ML2 drivers. The ML2 driver is responsible for port group"},{"line_number":30,"context_line":"configuration (creation/deletion) on ToR switch during deployment."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"9f6a8fd7_9c94858d","line":27,"range":{"start_line":27,"start_character":22,"end_line":27,"end_character":68},"updated":"2018-04-17 00:39:37.000000000","message":"actually it\u0027s already done, what currently lacking in ngs is put it to use.","commit_id":"2f5ade4dd1595966314e0bb6b41ed574a3285961"}]}