)]}'
{"api-ref/source/v2/intro.inc":[{"author":{"_account_id":9396,"name":"igordcard","email":"igordcard@gmail.com","username":"igordcard"},"change_message_id":"46e223a57374e9dfab77a044d438f16c6172d2cf","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":139,"context_line":""},{"line_number":140,"context_line":""},{"line_number":141,"context_line":"ORs and ANDs can be combined. For example, if you want all networks with"},{"line_number":142,"context_line":"admin_state_up\u003dTrue and shared\u003dTrue and named \u0027foobar\u0027 or \u0027bizbaz\u0027:"},{"line_number":143,"context_line":""},{"line_number":144,"context_line":".. code::"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-c++src","patch_set":1,"id":"ff0f0b1f_03dfff68","line":142,"range":{"start_line":142,"start_character":0,"end_line":142,"end_character":67},"updated":"2017-05-25 10:40:40.000000000","message":"Does ordering have an effect?\n\nWithout any kind of grouping it gets a bit confusing the first time someone sees this, and so I\u0027d recommend writing the result as an expression and not just text (different people with different reading skills might read something different). So, looking at the example below, should it be interpreted as:\n\n(name\u003dfoobar OR name\u003dbizbaz) AND admin_state_up\u003dTrue AND shared\u003dTrue ?\n\nAnd again, does ordering have any effect? If admin_state_up was moved between the 2 names, what would change?","commit_id":"f1e03f3dbf6dae0d28c9e1d00bb20f3db42ca68f"},{"author":{"_account_id":7787,"name":"Kevin Benton","email":"kevin@benton.pub","username":"blak111"},"change_message_id":"6ab9ddbe9e9fbc98d848b6f587888533e1a5e166","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":139,"context_line":""},{"line_number":140,"context_line":""},{"line_number":141,"context_line":"ORs and ANDs can be combined. For example, if you want all networks with"},{"line_number":142,"context_line":"admin_state_up\u003dTrue and shared\u003dTrue and named \u0027foobar\u0027 or \u0027bizbaz\u0027:"},{"line_number":143,"context_line":""},{"line_number":144,"context_line":".. code::"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-c++src","patch_set":1,"id":"ff0f0b1f_bad506e8","line":142,"range":{"start_line":142,"start_character":0,"end_line":142,"end_character":67},"in_reply_to":"ff0f0b1f_03dfff68","updated":"2017-05-25 21:23:23.000000000","message":"No effect. Anything keys repeated are an OR with each other only. Everything else is AND\u0027ed.\n\nSince this already merged, feel free to file another patch and tag me as a reviewer with whatever changes you think will make it easier to understand.\n\nI just wanted it to get corrected quickly since it was stating the opposite of what was possible and it was causing Nova folks to waste API calls.","commit_id":"f1e03f3dbf6dae0d28c9e1d00bb20f3db42ca68f"}]}
